Beware

They say it was a magnificent building, the Temple in Jerusalem. Newly reconstructed by Herod the Great, and still under construction in Jesus’ day, it was one of the seven wonders of the ancient world. It occupied a platform of more than 900 by 1,500 feet—twice as large as the Roman Forum with its many temples and four times as large as the Acropolis in Athens with the famous Parthenon. The massive retaining walls that supported the temple, including the now well-known Western wall, were composed of enormous blocks of white stone, some of them 40 feet long. The front of the temple itself was a square of 150 feet by 150 feet of sculpted rock, much of it decorated with silver and gold. First-century Jewish historian, Josephus  wrote that the gold “effected so fierce a blaze of fire that those who tried to look at it were forced to turn away. Jerusalem and the temple seemed in the distance like a mountain covered in snow, for any part not covered in gold was dazzling white.” The combination of the temple mount, the platform of huge retaining stones, and the large building of the temple itself raised the temple complex to a height that could be seen from miles away by pilgrims journeying to Jerusalem to worship there, and in bright sunlight, the luminous city nearly blinded them.

This was the dwelling place of God at the center of the world; this was the promise become rock of God’s presence with God’s people Israel. It was holy ground where God’s people, even when they failed to lead holy lives, could approach their holy God in worship. Rituals of atonement and purification along with festivals of liberation and thanksgiving sustained a community striving to live faithfully with their God. The temple was beautiful and it was an essential institution of Jewish life.

Jesus and the disciples had come to the Temple every day since they first came to Jerusalem. Tensions between him and the Temple leadership had been growing. Now they were leaving, and one of the disciples, his eyes wide with awe, his hands perhaps touching one of the colossal blocks, said to him, “Look, teacher, what large stones and what large buildings!” It was one of those moments when you want to take a photo to convey to the folks at home just how spectacular the place was and how overwhelming the feeling of being immersed in its beauty and power.

“Do you see these great buildings?” Jesus replied. “Not one stone will be left here upon another; all will be thrown down.” The words sound very matter-of-fact, don’t they? Jesus stated the almost unimaginable, but his words were no threat, just a simple announcement. The beauty, the majesty, the power would crumble and collapse, and the magnificent temple, center of Jewish life and identity, would be a pile of rubble. Curiously, the inner circle of disciples who were with him when he was sitting on the Mount of Olives with its spectacular view of the Temple Mount, didn’t ask him why or how, they wanted to know when and what the sign would be – as though the why and how were a given, and everything was just a matter of time. When will this be and what will be the sign that all these things are about to be accomplished?

The Gospel of Mark was written in a time of war. The weight of Roman occupation had become too much to bear for the Jewish population. In the years 62-66, increasing mob violence was disrupting life in Jerusalem. A band of assassins, called sicarii, attacked and murdered people, even a high priest, in broad daylight and kidnapped Jewish officials. Gangs of roaming brigands burned and looted villages. Apocalyptic prophets delivered oracles of doom, and the daily news seemed to confirm their words. Jerusalem was a tinderbox in those tumultuous years, with revolutionary sentiments mounting and finally catapulting Judea into open rebellion against Rome.

“Deceivers and impostors, under the pretense of divine inspiration, fostering revolutionary changes,” wrote Josephus, “they persuaded the masses to act like madmen and led them out into the desert in the belief that God would give them signs of deliverance.” Insurgents took control of the city, but the years 67-69 unfolded under the headline, “The Empire Strikes Back.” Rome’s legions under Titus laid siege to Jerusalem, and in August of the year 70, the Temple was destroyed and the city fell.

The Gospel of Mark was written in a time of wars and rumors of wars, and at least some believers in the Markan community must have thought that these catastrophic events meant that the return of Jesus in power and glory was imminent. The author made sure his people and all who would read his testimony would hear Jesus’ words to the disciples loud and clear: “Beware that no one leads you astray.” There will be wars and rumors of wars, nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom; there will be earthquakes and famines and unspeakable acts of violence, but you – beware that no one leads you astray. Beware that no one leads you off the path I followed. Follow me.

There is a constant, churning undercurrent in the history of the church that seeks to take contemporary events and turn them into sure signs for the end of time. The fighting in Syria, the crash of a Russian airplane over Sinai, murderous attacks in Beirut and Paris – we are afraid, we are worried and angry, we are sad, we are furious – and you know that the doomsday machine of the Christian psychics online and on TV has once again shifted into high gear. They’re busy drawing lines from the evening news to verses in the book of Revelation and in Daniel, and they can’t wait to give us all the details and plot lines of history at the end of time. Lamar Williamson calls them “date fixers” who “besides pretending to know more than the Son [of God] does, often have little sense of responsibility for the world, whose destruction they await with fascinated detachment. In contrast to these, Jesus speaks of responsibilities imposed by the master who left us in charge here” (Williamson, Mark, 241).

When the disciples ask, “When?” and “What will be the sign?” Jesus responds, “Beware.” Beware that no one leads you astray from following me. Beware of following your fear. Beware of abandoning your call to love God and neighbor. Wars and rumors of wars, terror and oppression are the reality of a world far from the world God desires, and they must end for God’s creation to be whole and complete. “This must take place, but the end is still to come,” says Jesus, and, “This is but the beginning of the birthpangs.”

Birth pangs, he says. These things that make us cry and tremble and doubt and lie awake at night – they are not a meaningless pile of suffering, the tragic rubble of history, destined to be forgotten; they are labor pains, he says, telling us that the suffering of creation is to be redeemed by the joy of birth. The world is in labor, Jesus says. Birth pangs, the first pains of childbirth. “How long is this labor?” we want to know, “and when can we expect to behold new life in a redeemed world? How long until we will laugh with tears in our eyes and cry no more?” We don’t know. But we have a word that speaks of birth in the midst of suffering. We have a word that teaches us to hope. We have the promise that with the resurrection of Jesus the whole world has indeed become new – in forgiveness, in the disruption of the endless cycle of violence, in love that heals and renews. We have the promise that the resurrection of Jesus from the dead marks the beginning of redemption that doesn’t fade into the past but abides forever.

The English historian Eric Hobsbawm, born in 1917, grew up in Vienna and, after the death of his parents, with an aunt in Berlin. Berlin was not a good place to live for a Jewish teenager in those years. He was fifteen years old when one day in January 1933, as he was walking his little sister home from school, he saw the headline at a newsstand, “Adolph Hitler Appointed Chancellor of Germany.” Reflecting on those years when democray in Germany was in its death throes, Hobsbawm later wrote, “We were on the Titanic, and everyone knew it was hitting the iceberg.” He said, “It is difficult for those who have not experienced the ‘Age of Catastrophe’ of the twentieth century in central Europe to see what it meant to live in a world that was simply not expected to last, in something that could not really even be described as a world, but merely as a provisional waystation between a dead past and a future not yet born.”[1]

In-between times are difficult to understand, let alone navigate, for those who live in them. But we dare to hope that, regardless of the terrors of the past and present, the redemption of the world and the birth of new life has indeed begun with the resurrection of Jesus from the dead, and our determination to resist the servants of terror and death is grounded in that hope.

Thrones and temples will fall and not one stone will be left upon another, institutions will crumble, but the work of Christ will stand, and the world being born in his wake is the world set right. Jesus is working on a new temple, and it’s made entirely of people whose daily sacrifice are their prayers and their acts of loving service. Jesus is working on a new temple that isn’t covered with gold or silver, but shines brighter than anything made by human hands.

 


 

[1] Tony Judt, Reappraisals: Reflections on the forgotten twentieth century (New York: Penguin, 2008), 117.

You and I and how we care

On October 29, I launched a very unscientific survey. I was and still am curious about traditions of caring for friends and neighbors in need. I asked individual readers to respond how they wanted to be helped in a particular situation.

The situations, each with suggestions listed and an option to write in additional acts of kindness, included

When I'm sick for more than a couple of days...

When somebody close to me has died...

When a baby has been born...

When I've lost my job...

After my youngest has left for college...

I continue to receive responses, but I thought it would be fun and enlightening to share the results based on 80 submissions.

All age groups were well represented, with a neat generational split between respondents under/over age 45.

An initial count of respondents' preferred ways of being cared for regardless of age or situation showed that prayer and notes still rank at the top.

The responses have been abbreviated:

  • Pray - Pray for me
  • Note - Send me a note (handwritten or email)
  • Sit - Come and sit with me for a while
  • Food - Bring Food
  • Coffee - Come by for a cup of coffee
  • Kids - Take the kids for a couple of hours
  • Chocolate - Send chocolate
  • Groceries - Get my groceries
  • Invite me - Take me out for lunch or dinner or an outing
  • Walk my dog - Walk my dog
  • Laundry - Do my laundry
  • Clean - Clean my bedroom, bathroom, house
  • Mow the yard - Mow the yard
  • Move in - Move in and take care of things for a week
  • Call me - Call, email, or txt me and ask me what I need you to do
  • Borrow your dog - Let me borrow your dog
  • Network - Help me network, know about job openings, find a job
  • Kitten - Send me a kitten

Below I have posted the responses to the five situations, according to the two almost equal age groupings. In a follow up post next week, I will post the results for individual caring actions and how they relate to each of the five situations.

 

The new temple

The poor widow put in everything she had, all she had to live on, and we don’t even know her name. No one suggested that one of the pillars in the women’s court of the temple be named after her. The only reason we know about her is that Jesus was paying attention and called the disciples so we would pay attention to the scene. “She has put in everything she had,” he said, “all she had to live on, her whole life.”

Imagine you’re directing a movie based on the gospel of Mark, and you’re getting ready to shoot this very scene, and the young man who’s playing Jesus asks you, “How do you want me to deliver this line? What emotions are giving energy to these words? Is it surprise? Praise? Does he want the disciples to admire or imitate her? Look at her. She has put in everything she had, all she had to live on, her whole life. Or is he sad, perhaps even angry because this poor just dropped her last two pennies in the offering plate? Look at her. She has put in everything she had, all she had to live on, her whole life. Tell me, how do you want me to say this line, with a smile or with a broken heart or with righteous anger?”

You’re the director, but you don’t have an answer ready. “I hadn’t thought of that one,” you say, “everybody, take five.” Now, while you’re thinking about what to tell that actor, did you hear the story about the college in upstate New York? Back in July, Joan Weill, the wife of Citigroup billionaire Sandy Weill, announced that they would donate $20 million to Paul Smith’s College, a small, cash-strapped school in the Adirondack Mountains. The big bundle of money came with one string attached: She insisted that the school would have to be renamed in her honor, to be known forever as Joan Weill-Paul Smith’s College. Weill is a former trustee of the school, which sits miles from the nearest town and specializes in forestry and hospitality programs. She’s given big gifts in the past, and the library and the student center both are already named after her. Mrs. Weill argued that with her name given top billing, more donors around the country would open their wallets.

Paul Smith’s was named for a pioneer of this rugged region just south of the U.S.-Canada border who opened a wilderness lodge in the 1850s that hosted guests such as Teddy Roosevelt and Calvin Coolidge. Smith’s family donated land for the college in the 1940s. So when alumni learned that his name would now be given second billing, it infuriated many. “It makes me sick, to be honest with you,” said Jason Endries, who graduated 15 years ago. “I don’t consider it to be much of a gift if you require something. Usually a gift is given out of generosity and not requiring something in return.” Well, what Jason calls ‘usually’ is in fact becoming the rare exception. Pablo Eisenberg, a senior fellow at the Center for Public and Nonprofit Leadership at Georgetown University, says asking that entire institutions be rebranded in exchange for a gift reflects a new attitude, a new trend among the megarich. “There are very few anonymous donors anymore, and there are few that are satisfied to give a big donation and not have that object of the donation named after them,” he says. Eisenberg says a lot of institutions now think of naming rights as an asset, something they can offer as an enticement, but he worries that colleges and arts institutions could wind up swapping names the way sports stadiums do. “If somebody gives $20 million and someone else comes up and says, ‘I’m going to give you $50 million,’ does that mean they’re going to change their name again?” he says. “It’s a crazy system.”

In the case of Paul Smith’s College, a state court judge ruled in October that the name change would violate terms of the original will and the original gift that established the school. Facing growing pressure from alumni and fearing a long court fight, the college decided not to appeal. With naming rights no longer on the table, the Weill family withdrew the $20 million gift.[1]

Sitting in the temple, opposite the treasury, Jesus noticed many rich people putting in large sums. Large gifts draw attention, and the givers of large sums enjoy being known for their generosity; some enjoy it so much they don’t wait for somebody to suggest that a bridge, building, school, or chapel be named in their memory and honor – they turn their gift into a purchase of memory and honor.

Both scenes in today’s gospel reading are about attention. “Beware of the scribes,” Jesus taught the crowd that was listening to him with delight. Not the scribes in general, but the ones who like to walk around in long robes. They like to be seen; they like to be noticed. They want to be greeted with respect in the markets. They like having seats of honor in the synagogues and at banquets. They strut about, peacocks of piety spreading their tails, but you know they devour widows’ houses while saying long prayers for the sake of appearance.

Jesus was teaching in the temple, surrounded by magnificent buildings, at the heart of an institution established to the glory and honor of God, but used and abused for the worst of very human ends: vanity, self-promotion, exploitation. Nobody was paying attention to the poor widow who put in two small copper coins, worth less than a penny, which is like nothing compared to the gifts of the rich, but it was everything to her. Nobody was paying attention to her which is why Jesus is pointing her out to us. Not a word of praise comes from his lips, though, and nothing indicates that he is lifting her up as an example. All he does is describe what she is doing.

So much attention for those who gave much, so little for her who gave everything. You’re the director of this movie; what do you tell the actor playing Jesus? His tone of voice is critical in this scene. Do you tell him to tap into the joy that floods the heart when you witness this woman’s act of complete devotion to God? Or do you tell him to give voice to the anger that ties your innards into knots when you observe how an institution that is supposed to glorify God takes a poor woman’s last two pennies?

You can’t decide, and so you sit there a little longer with Jesus, opposite the treasury. Do you remember when he entered the temple the day after they came to Jerusalem? Do you remember how he threw out those who were selling and buying there? How he overturned the tables of the money changers and the chairs of those who sold doves? He didn’t allow anyone to carry anything through the temple. He practically shut down the entire operation, at least for a moment. “Is it not written,” he said, and you don’t have any trouble imagining in what tone of voice he was yelling across the courtyard, “‘My house shall be called a house of prayer for all the nations’? But you have made it a den of robbers.”[2]

God’s holy temple had become a house of corruption, and Jesus was working on a new way of being God’s holy temple. The new temple would not be run by pompous men in long robes or fine suits, quick to identify the best seats in the house and eager to sit in them. The new temple would not be a place for pride and greed barely concealed behind facades of ostentatious piety. The new temple would be a community of people, gathering in houses of prayer for all the nations, practicing forgiveness, and bearing fruit through love of God and neighbor.[3]

The new temple is both humble and grand. It is humble because it is a community of people who love God with all their heart, and with all their soul, and with all their mind, and with all their strength, and who love their neighbor as themselves, nothing more. And the new temple is grand because it is a community of people who make their whole life a gift to the glory of God in daily acts of faithfulness, no strings attached. The whole structure is raised to honor God’s holy name, and the names of God’s people are written in the book of life and remembered when the community gathers around the Lord’s table.

So, what do you tell the actor who’s waiting for you to tell him how to deliver that line? The poor widow gave everything she had, she gave her whole life, entrusting herself completely in God’s hands, and in Jesus’ eyes her gift became a testimony against the institutional leadership who had turned God’s house into a den of robbers. Do you tell the actor to say the line with both joy and severe judgment? Or do you go to your producer and tell her that it can’t be done; that these words aren’t meant to be the script for a movie; that they are to be pondered so they shape and transform our life?

This is the final scene in the temple, and the poor widow’s gift foreshadows the gift Jesus is about to complete: his own life, given in love, entrusted into God’s hands, but also taken by the sin that corrupts our life together. The gift is both a judgment of our sin and a testimony to God’s power to redeem us. And it is the foundation on which the new temple is being built.

 


[1] http://www.npr.org/2015/11/03/454036482/give-a-donation-ask-for-naming-rights

[2] Mark 11:15-17

[3] See Mark 11:24-25; 12:1-12; 12:28-34

One of the scribes

A famous story in the Talmud tells about a gentile who wanted to convert to Judaism. He went to Rabbi Shammai and said to him, “Take me as a proselyte, but on condition that you teach me the entire Torah, all of it, while I stand on one foot.” Shammai, insulted by this request, threw him out of the house. Then the man went to Rabbi Hillel, and Hillel accepted the challenge, saying, “What you don’t like, don’t do to your neighbor. That is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary – now go and study!”[1]

The debate didn’t begin with Shammai and Hillel, and it didn’t end with them. According to Jewish tradition, 613 commandments were given to Moses. 365 negative commandments, answering to the number of days of the year, and 248 positive commandments, answering to the number of members of the human body.[2] Thus the commandments address the whole human person, every day of the year, and they cover all of life: what to eat and what to wear, when to work and when to rest, how to teach your children and how to treat strangers, how to lend and how to borrow, how to love your spouse and how to cook, how to pray and how to farm, everything.

Is there a way, the students of Torah wondered, to capture that totality in a single teaching? Is there one commandment that is something like the principle that is being unfolded in all the others, a primal commandment that represents all the others? The prophet Micah named three, “What does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?”[3] The prophet Isaiah named two, “Maintain justice and do what is right.”[4] The prophet Amos named one, “Seek me and live.”[5] And the prophet Habakkuk named another, “The righteous shall live by their faith.”[6]

It was common practice among Jews to ask their teachers which was the first commandment. Hillel answered, “What you don’t like, don’t do to your neighbor.” I noticed an application of that commandment with respect to Halloween this past week when I overheard a conversation among middle-aged adults about what treats to give the children who come trick-or-treating. One said, she always hands out candy she wished she had been given when she was little. What she doesn’t like, she doesn’t do to her little neighbors, assuming, of course, that not much has changed in the world of chocolate, candy bars, and gummi bears in the last few decades. You see the problem here: just because you like something, doesn’t mean your neighbor likes it. The trouble with Hillel’s answer is that you may end up making your own likes the standard for how you treat your neighbors. Hillel, of course, would jump in and say, “Wait a minute, not so fast. If you don’t like others making themselves the standard for how they treat you, don’t do it to them.” Excellent point.

I started a little unscientific survey on Thursday. No, I didn’t poll the neighborhood kids to learn what their favorite candy might be. I asked questions about traditions of caring for friends and neighbors in times of need: What did you do when your neighbor’s mother died? What did your friends do when you had your first child? If you were sick for more than just a couple of days, what would be the most helpful thing a friend or neighbor could offer to do?

I asked these questions, because we all have stories about friends who left flowers at our door when we didn’t expect it, and it just made our day, or about neighbors who mowed our yard when mom was in the hospital for weeks, and they did it because they cared, and not to finally show us how it’s done properly.

One of the items included in the survey is, “When I’m sick for more than a couple of days ...” and in response you can either check various responses or add your own. The options I listed are

  • bring food
  • take the kids for a couple of hours
  • get my groceries
  • send chocolate
  • walk my dog
  • mow the yard
  • pray for me
  • send me a note
  • come by for a cup of coffee
  • clean my bathroom
  • do my laundry
  • come and sit with me for a while
  • Other:

Each of these is a way to love your neighbor as yourself, but even a casual glance at the more than fifty surveys that have come in so far shows that our needs and the things that delight us are very different. Some of us just want to be by ourselves when we’re sick and perhaps receive a note while others love the idea of somebody moving in and taking over pretty much all of our household and parenting responsibilities. I hope to come up with a way to report all the findings of the very unscientific survey in a meaningful way, but two findings already are apparent:

1. The better we know each other, the better we are able to care for each other.

2. One of the most caring things we can do for each other is ask, “What can I do for you?”

When the scribe asked Jesus, “Which commandment is the first of all?” he did what Jews commonly did in those days, that is ask their teachers the big question, and the teachers in turn asked each other, all in pursuit of deeper understanding and for the sake of a life of righteousness. They shared the desire to know if there was a defining principle or a primal commandment that was the rock on which the whole structure of statutes, decrees, precepts, and ordinances rested.

Jesus answered, “The first is, ‘Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one; you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.’ The second is this, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.”  Jesus didn’t name just one commandment, but two, implying that the will and desire of God for God’s people cannot be reduced to a single principle; all the commandments are rooted in a set of relationships. The two go together, love of God and love of neighbor, and because they are linked we cannot relate well to God without relating well to each other, and vice versa.

Most of us think we know what love is and that we are talking about the same thing when we say the word – but we’re not. Love is about affection and it is about commitment and belonging, love is about vulnerability and desire; and the constellation of these elements shifts from person to person and from season to season. In our culture, love has long been in danger of being reduced to having good feelings about someone or something. Douglas Hare reminds us that,

In an age when the word ‘love’ is greatly abused, it is important to remember that the primary component of biblical love is not affection but commitment. Warm feelings of gratitude may fill our consciousness as we consider all that God has done for us, but it is not warm feelings that [the commandment] demands of us but rather stubborn, unwavering commitment. Similarly, to love our neighbor, including our enemies, does not mean that we must feel affection for them. To love the neighbor is to imitate God by taking their needs seriously.[7]

Love is a deep loyalty to another, and when Jesus teaches us to recognize how loving our neighbor and loving our God are intimately linked, he is not telling us to have warm feelings for friends and strangers alike, but to commit ourselves to their wellbeing. Your neighbor, according to Jesus, can literally be your next-door neighbor who might be tired of eating alone or who might need somebody to rake the leaves for her. Your neighbor may be your father and mother who, after so many years, need you in unfamiliar ways that almost reverse the relationship of parent and child. Your neighbor is every person you encounter, and to love them is to take their desire to flourish as seriously as you take your own. And Jesus never said it was easy.

Then the scribe said to Jesus, “You are right, Teacher; you have truly said that ‘he is one, and besides him there is no other’; and ‘to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the strength,’ and ‘to love one’s neighbor as oneself,’—this is much more important than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices.”

The scribe agreed with Jesus. This remarkable scene is the only one in Mark’s gospel where a religious authority agrees with Jesus. Throughout his ministry, Jesus had encountered strong opposition from Jewish leaders connected with the temple, the chief priests, scribes and elders, and now that Jesus was in Jerusalem, the conflict between him and them continued to escalate. They were already collaborating to have him arrested and put on trial, and any questions they were asking him were designed to trip him up or trap him. But this scribe broke the hostile pattern by asking an honest question. In the middle of the brewing storm he and Jesus made room for each other and for the pursuit of a deeper understanding of God’s will and desire for God’s people, and they discovered that they agreed.

“You are not far from the kingdom of God,” Jesus said to him, and that is as close as it gets in Mark’s telling of the gospel for any of us who await the kingdom’s consummation. Not far from the kingdom, closer to the truth and peace of God.

As we remember and give thanks today “for all the saints who from their labors rest,” let us offer a prayer for those in every generation who broke the hostile patterns of their time by asking honest questions in pursuit of the knowledge of God and a life of righteousness. Let us offer a prayer for those who ask their neighbor, “What can I do for you?” And let us not forget that those who have gone before us are not merely resting in peace, but waiting for us to join them. They are rooting for us as we seek to live life as the gift of God it is.

 


[1] Shabbat 31a

[2] See Makkot 23b-24a

[3] Micah 6:8

[4] Isaiah 56:1

[5] Amos 5:4

[6] Habakkuk 2:4

[7] Douglas Hare, “Matthew,” Interpretation, 260.

A Very Unscientific Survey

How about it? A very unscientific survey about traditions of caring for friends and neighbors in times of need.

What did you do when your neighbor's mother died?

What did your friends do when you had your first child?

If you were sick for a week, what would be the most helpful thing a friend or neighbor could offer to do?

We all have stories to tell around these questions; the great surprises, the disappointments, the things people do we wish they'd stop doing. We come from different backgrounds, belong to different generations, have different expectations, different needs. So, how about a very unscientific survey? It's anonymous and it's not nearly as long as it looks.

 

Can you see me now?

My friend John is a photographer, but he also loves to tell stories about his travels in the U. S. and around the world. A few days ago, John talked about a trip to India and the large groups of children that often surrounded him there, laughing, shouting, pulling his sleeves and begging for change, and how one day he decided that he was done handing out small coins to them. He got into the back of one of those three-wheel taxis and took off, feeling terrible about his lack of generosity and compassion. He turned around and looked back through the small window cut into the canvas of the cab; he saw the children he had just so cold-heartedly abandoned: they were playing soccer on the street, laughing and shouting and having a great time. He was relieved to see them run around and play, and to note that, contrary to the dark thoughts of his guilt-ridden heart, their world did not revolve around him.

Another story he told that night was from a trip to China. He visited a town where begging had apparently been elevated to a performance art. John saw a man at a street corner, and he was fascinated by him while at the same time trying to ignore him. The man had no legs and he was sitting in a small wooden cart; one of his arms looked twisted and paralyzed, and he used his other arm to push himself forward. John tried to look past him, but the man wouldn’t let him. He addressed John as he walked past, but John kept walking, pretending he couldn’t hear him. He thought he had escaped, but the man in the cart followed him, pushing himself forward on the road with astounding proficiency. John walked a little faster, his eyes firmly locked on the end of the street, but the man didn’t stop his pursuit. John picked up the pace some more, but the man in the cart was determined and astonishingly quick on his wheels. They came to the end of the block and John crossed the street, certain that the man would give up the chase now, but no, he was relentless. Halfway down the second block, John stopped and turned around. They looked at each other, neither said a word, and then they just burst out laughing, deep, full-throated belly laughs that shook their bodies so hard that fear, guilt, awkwardness, shame and anger vanished until nothing but joy remained. Then they went to get a cup of tea.

+++

Mark Horvath also works with a camera, but his preferred format are video and film. He once heard a story about a homeless man on Hollywood Blvd who thought he was invisible. One day a kid handed the man a pamphlet, and he was shocked and amazed: “What!? You can see me? How can you see me? I’m invisible!”

Horvath writes about that moment, “It isn’t hard to comprehend this man’s slow spiral into invisibility. Once on the street, people started to walk past him, ignoring him as if he didn’t exist … much like they do a piece of trash on the sidewalk. It’s not that people are bad, but if we make eye contact, or engage in conversation, then we have to admit they exist and that we might have a basic human need to care. But it’s so much easier to simply close our eyes and shield our hearts to their existence.” Horvath knows we’re not literally closing our eyes; we just keep them focussed on the end of the street and hope that invisibility works both ways. The homeless man blends into the background, and we who are passing by blend into the steady stream of faceless pedestrians; it’s a kind of blindness.

Horvath writes about homeless men and women, “I not only feel their pain, I truly know their pain. I lived their pain. You’d never know it now but I was a homeless person. Seventeen years ago, I lived on Hollywood Blvd. But today, I find myself looking away, ignoring the faces, avoiding their eyes — and I’m ashamed when I realize I’m doing it. But I really can feel their pain, and it is almost unbearable, but it’s just under the surface of my professional exterior.” After years of using a television camera to tell the stories of homelessness and the organizations trying to help, Horvath began shooting short, unedited clips of homeless men and women telling their stories, and he posted them on his website, Invisible People. The purpose of the project, he writes, “is to make the invisible visible. I hope these people and their stories connect with you and don’t let go. I hope their conversations with me will start a conversation in your circle of friends.”[1] Stories and conversations against the pervasive blindness.

+++

Jesus and his band of disciples were in Galilee, where Jesus was proclaiming the good news of God: “the time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God has come near; repent, and believe in the good news.”[2] He healed the sick, freed the oppressed, he taught and fed the people with parables and bread, and the disciples watched and learned. They watched a lot, but they were slow to learn. “Do you still not perceive or understand?” Jesus said to them at one point, frustration in his voice. “Do you have eyes, but fail to see?”[3]

They came to Bethsaida, on the northern shore of the Sea of Galilee, and people brought a blind man to him and begged him to touch him. Jesus laid his hands on his eyes and looked at him intently and the man’s sight was restored and he saw everything clearly.[4] The disciples watched, but they were slow to understand who Jesus was, and what it meant to follow him. They were far from seeing everything clearly.

They followed him as best they could as he turned to Jerusalem. On the way, Jesus told them repeatedly what would happen in the city and he taught them about the demands of discipleship, about serving one another and being attentive to little ones and about the meaning of greatness in the kingdom of God. “What is it you want me to do for you?” Jesus asked the sons of Zebedee, who had been with him almost as long as Peter, and they responded, “Grant us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory.”[5] Jesus modeled being a servant, but his disciples, to this day, dream of power and privilege.

Then they came to Jericho, the last stop for travelers and pilgrims on the way to Jerusalem, and there, just outside the city, sitting by the roadside, was Bartimaeus, a blind beggar. When he heard that it was Jesus who was walking by, he began to shout out, “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!” Many in the crowd told him to hold his tongue and be quiet. Easy for them to say, they weren’t beggars. For them it was just fine for Bartimaeus to blend into the background and remain invisible, but he cried out even more loudly, “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!” He knew it was Messiah time; he knew this was the time when the eyes of the blind are opened and the poor have their debts canceled and the oppressed go free. He may have been blind, but his vision was better than theirs; his insight more profound than the disciples’. He named and entreated Jesus, and when the people rebuked him, he asked again, louder this time. He refused to be silenced. He refused to blend into the background and remain part of the everyday road side backdrop everybody had gotten used to. He cried out, relentlessly, and Jesus stood still. “Call him here,” he said, and they did. “Courage,” they said, “get up, he’s calling you.” They didn’t have to tell him twice. He sprang up and came to Jesus.

“What do you want me to do for you?” Jesus asked him, the same question he had asked James and John who had been stumbling along behind him since the earliest days of his mission in Galilee. They dreamed of power and privilege; they didn’t see who he was; they didn’t perceive what his mission was, despite their having been with him so long. The blind beggar answered Jesus, “Let me see again.” And Jesus said, “Go, your faith has made you well.” He didn’t send him away; he told him that the days of his marginalization and invisibility were over. Bartimaeus regained his sight and followed Jesus on the way to the cross.

After a long series of episodes in Mark’s gospel in which the disciples just don’t get it, it is a blind man who finally sees clearly who Jesus is and follows him up to Jerusalem. There’s hope for us blind beggars who can’t quite see who Jesus is and what it means to follow him. It’s Messiah time; he’s calling us. The rich man went away grieving when Jesus called him, for he had many possessions. Bartimaeus, throwing off his cloak, jumped up and came to Jesus and followed him on the way. His cloak was everything for him, mattress, blanket, umbrella, coat and coin catcher – it was everything he owned and it represented the life he left behind for the sake of the kingdom, like a fisherman who walks away from his nets and a tax collector who abandons his desk to follow Jesus. Bartimaeus walked away from invisibility and blindness and followed Jesus on the kingdom way. With his eyes opened by Jesus, he began to see everything in his light. He began to notice what others routinely missed or ignored. He began to see everything in the context of Jesus and found a whole new life.

Jesus asks a simple question, “What do you want me to do for you?”

How do you answer?

 


[1] http://invisiblepeople.tv/blog/about/

[2] Mk 1:14f

[3] Mark 8:17f.

[4] Mk 8:25

[5] Mk 10:36

Chief of Staff or glorified butler?

They were going up to Jerusalem, and Jesus was walking ahead of them, with urgency in his stride, a solitary figure against the horizon. All the disciples could do was try and keep up with him. They didn’t fully know yet who it was they were following and where he was going. On the road, Jesus had taught them that the Son of Man must undergo great suffering and be killed and after three days rise again, and they couldn’t bear to hear it. The first time it was Peter who rebuked him for saying such things. The second time, Jesus told them again how the Son of Man would be betrayed into human hands and be killed, and after three days rise again. They didn’t understand what he was saying, and instead of asking him, they argued with each other about who was the greatest. Jesus was way ahead of them, and all they could do was try and keep up with him.

A third time he stopped to tell them what was going to happen to him. He saw with blinding clarity where he was headed. He would be handed over; the temple authorities would reject him and condemn him to death; Rome’s soldiers would mock him, spit on him, and torture him before killing him. And after three days he would rise again. This time, James and John approached him, the sons of Zebedee; they had been with him since the first days of his mission in Galilee. And what did they say?

“Teacher, we want you to do for us whatever we ask of you.”

Who did they think he was – a genie? Perhaps they weren’t as inattentive and insensitive as we might suppose. Perhaps they had actually listened to every word he had just said. Perhaps they weren’t as obtuse as it might seem to us; perhaps they had heard every detail about how he would run into the walls of rejection and political convenience and how these walls would become his grave. And perhaps their confidence in Jesus’ final triumph was so complete that they looked past the thick clouds ahead and past the deep darkness of his execution; they looked past all that and with one great leap they landed by the throne of the Messiah’s glorious reign. In their minds, the way of Christ was but a step from all that was wrong with the world to the reign of righteousness. In their minds, they were already standing at the door, their toes touching the threshold to the royal hall, and they saw the Risen One seated on the throne of glory.

“What is it you want me to do for you?” Jesus asked them. “Grant us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory,” they replied. They were dreaming about cabinet seats. Certainly the Messiah would need a Chief of Staff or a Secretary of Righteous Reign – and why not them, trusted friends who had been with him almost from day one? They knew how power works: the ladder stretching from those who sit in the dust all the way up to those whose feet never touch the ground because they sit on thrones and ride in limousines or fly in personal jets. It’s a long ladder with many rungs, and the higher you climb, the greater the influence and the more exclusive the company. They knew how power works. Listening to the news out of Washington, it may seem like nobody wants to sit in the chair of the Speaker of the House these days, but that’s only temporary; that’s only because all the chairs are constantly being rearranged and it’s not always clear which seat at any given time gives greater influence to its occupant. “Grant us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory,” the sons of Zebedee asked, imagining the glory of God’s reign like any ladder of earthly rule, only shinier and purer – without special interest lobbyists and big donors and cover-ups. When we think about power, we think about ladders and about climbing from the bottom to the top – or we worry about sliding or falling. Social Psychologists tell us that status anxiety accounts for much of what we do on a daily basis – we want to know where we are on the ladder and where the people around us fit in – above? Below? Somewhere on the same level?

I keep a copy of a long list of titles in the Federal Government, just for the joy of reading them out loud:

  • Principal Assistant Deputy Under Secretary
  • Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary
  • Chief of Staff to the Assistant Assistant Secretary
  • Associate Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary
  • Chief of Staff to the Associate Assistant Secretary
  • Principal Deputy to the Deputy Assistant Secretary[1]

How do they fit these on a business card? I imagine myself at a cocktail party in D.C. with a few hundred of my closest co-workers, each representing one of countless, minutely graduated status rankings differentiated by extremely subtle nuances only the truly initiated are capable of grasping. Somebody introduces me to the Principal Assistant Deputy Undersecretary and after a couple of minutes the Principal Deputy to the Deputy Assistant Secretary joins us and I know exactly which of the two is more important. The titles may spread like kudzu, but I always know which way is up.

James and John thought of God’s reign as Washington writ large, and they were disarmingly honest about wanting to be near the top rung of the ladder. “Grant us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory,” they said. And Jesus said to them, “You do not know what you are asking.” They may have been imagining something along the lines of being with Jesus in glory like Moses and Elijah were at the Transfiguration, but Mark is very careful to remind us that the only ones at Jesus’ left and right when he was hailed “King of the Jews” were the two bandits crucified with him.[2]

The way of Christ is the way of the cross, not a new and better way to secure power. The way of Christ goes against the logic of human institutions that are characterized by power exercised over others, by control of others, by ranking as the primary principle of social organization, and by hierarchies of dominant and subordinate. “Not so among you,” he says to us who try to follow and keep up with him. The way of Jesus is difficult because it requires of us the surrender of deep-rooted ideas of power and control, and a humble willingness to follow him.

“Not what I want, but what you want,” was the prayer of Jesus in Gethsemane as he prepared to drink the cup of suffering, and those who follow him pray like him. Not what I want – not my aspirations, my ambitions, my pursuits, but what you want – your will, your purpose, your kingdom.

The reign of God comes into the world not by overpowering its opponents, but by subverting our notions of power. The reign of God undermines our desire for control. The reign of God entered the world in Jesus who came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life to redeem us from the reign of death. Jesus didn’t manipulate people to get what he wanted. He didn’t lord it over those who recognized his authority. He didn’t use others in the pursuit of his own personal ambitions. He was in the world as one who served God and every human being he encountered. And he calls us, again and again, no matter how many times we get it wrong, to join him in his mission of service to all people. Following him on the way, we learn to look at others not as means to boost our own status; we learn to see people, all kinds of people, as fellow creatures whose desire to flourish goes hand in hand with God’s desire for all of creation. Jesus invites us to pray with him, “Not what I want, but what you want.” He invites us to quiet our anxious and ambitious selves, and to be open to the coming reign of God where love alone is sovereign.

We have heard it so many times, but it takes a lifetime to sink in: the way to be great is to be a servant, even as Jesus became a servant. Martin Copenhaver tells a story about a New England church he once served. Some of the older members could remember a time when the wealthy families would send their servants to help cook church suppers alongside those who did not have servants to send. The world changed, and by the time Pastor Martin came to the church these stories were repeated with some amusement, but similar confusions continued. According to the bylaws of the church the deacons were charged with the spiritual leadership of the congregation, and at a deacons meeting, someone complained that instead of being true to this high and momentous charge, deacons spent too much of their time delivering food to the homeless shelter and washing dishes after communion. How could they tend to important spiritual matters when they were occupied with such mundane tasks? “I schlepp bread and wine from the kitchen to the table, and when all have eaten I take the dishes back to the kitchen and wash them,” one of the deacons complained. “I feel like a glorified butler.” They did a little Bible study and discovered that the first deacons had been commissioned by the apostles in the Jerusalem church so that there would be someone to take food to the widows. They discovered that the word deacon was the anglicized version of the Greek diakonos, and that a diakonos was a servant or a waiter. They were indeed butlers, charged with the mundane task of delivering food, and also glorified because that simple act of service was an expression of the love of Christ the servant.[3]

Here at Vine Street, we’re only days away from hosting Room in the Inn guests for a week. We come together to prepare meals and serve them, to make beds and do the laundry, to open doors and welcome strangers so they might experience the hospitality of God’s house. Glorified butlers, waiters and servants? You could call it that. But you’re serving in the company of Jesus. You may not get your picture in the paper, you may not even get your name in the church newsletter, but for that one night, you are part of changing the world and welcoming the reign of God. For that one night, you not only get to watch, but participate in the power of love undermining the love of power.

 


[1] Paul C. Light, The True Size of Government (Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1999), 74.

[2] Mk 9:2-8; 15:27

[3] Martin Copenhaver, Christian Century, October 5, 1994, 893.

The children and the man

Here comes that man again, running up to Jesus with the big question he can’t answer himself. And before the man is close enough to kneel before Jesus, we already hear the echo of those dreaded words from Jesus’ lips, “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”

We have heard the story before, many times, we know he will go away grieving, for he had much to give away. A part of us grieves with him as we watch him leave. We like the fellow; he’s sincere about wanting to do the right thing, and his desire to inherit eternal life is genuine. We put ourselves in his shoes, and wonder what our response would be to Jesus’ unsettling proposition.

The words from the letter to the Hebrews still echo in our minds, “Indeed, the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing until it divides soul from spirit (…) it is able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart. And before him no creature is hidden, but all are naked and laid bare.”

The word of God is living and active, not safely contained between the covers of an old book; we cannot tame it with calligraphy we hang on the wall for a little inspiration. The word of God gets to us and leaves us unsettled. You may think twice before you cross stitch “Let the little children come to me” on your sofa pillow, for it may disrupt your slumber. The word of God is living and active and sharp, rendering us naked and bare before God. We wrap ourselves in all kinds of protective layers, but the word of God cuts through them like butter; it is aimed at the heart and it never misses.

“It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” Am I too rich for eternal life? Is my stuff getting between me and the life God wants for me and us and the whole creation? Is my stuff getting between me and the life I really want? Do I have to sell what I own and give it to the poor? All of it? Actually, I’m not rich, not really, am I? Donald Trump is rich, very rich, he says so himself. The story probably isn’t for me, it’s for people like him. I’m comfortable, but I’m not rich. Oprah is rich; Bill and Malinda Gates are rich, and the Koch brothers.

Our minds are very adept at adding layers so we don’t stand quite so naked and bare before God. Surely this episode isn’t to be taken literally. Surely the preacher can point to some spiritual meaning that won’t leave me penniless.

In conversation, one of us will tell the rest what she picked up on a blog or in the comment section of her study Bible. According to some medieval commentary ‘the eye of the needle’ was the name of one of the city gates in Jerusalem. In order for a camel to get through, the burden had to be taken off its back, and the camel had to get on its knees. This was obviously an excellent interpretation for a time when church leaders wanted to build cathedrals and monasteries: tell folks who wish to enter the kingdom to get on their knees and write checks until the burden on their back is small enough to fit through the gate. A convenient interpretation for a capital campaign, but one that misses the point entirely. Let alone that there never was such a gate. The word of God is living and active and sharp, and no effort of ours can render it convenient and dull or dead. There’s no easy button.

Just before this scene with the rich man, Mark tells us about the people who were bringing little children to Jesus in order that he might touch them. And Jesus said, “whoever does not receive the kingdom of God as a little child will never enter it.”[1] A little child is the personification of need and trusting dependence.  The rich man in today’s lesson is everything a little child is not; he is the personification of power, achievement, and confident independence. He is used to getting things done. When presented with a challenge, he has various options at his disposal, and a solution is never more than a phone call away. But he ran, Mark tells us, to get to Jesus, and now he’s kneeling in the dust. This man isn’t playing games. Something is missing in his life, and he is looking for more than words he can hang on the wall of his office.

“What must I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus responds by naming six of the ten commandments. “I have kept all these since my youth,” the man replies. Nothing in the story suggests that he is lying or bragging. He is a good man who has done everything right, yet his achievements are not enough. His virtues are not sufficient. Even his keeping of the commandments cannot still the question, “What must I do to inherit eternal life?”

Jesus loves this man, perhaps for his integrity, perhaps for his sincerity, his commitment to living a God-pleasing life. Perhaps Jesus loves him for asking big questions, questions that matter. And Jesus tells the man who wants to know what to do, what to do. “You lack one thing. Go, sell what you own, give the money to the poor; then come and follow me.”

The two back-to-back scenes in Mark’s telling of the gospel highlight a great irony: the little children who possess nothing, don’t lack anything – the kingdom of God is theirs. Yet this man who has achieved so much and knows so much, and possesses so much, lacks the one thing that would open to him the door to eternal life. “Go, sell what you own, give the money to the poor; then come, follow me.” He can’t do it.

“Children,” Jesus says to the disciples, “how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God!” They are as perplexed as we are. The eye of the needle is small, too small to squeeze through – then who can be saved? The word of God is living and active and sharp, rendering us naked and bare before God.

“What must I do to inherit eternal life?” The answer is: nothing. We cannot save ourselves. Neither accumulating wealth, knowledge or goodness, nor giving it all away will save us. God alone saves us. And so the question becomes, “What has God done to save us, to give us eternal life, to bring us into the kingdom?” The answer is a life lived for us; the answer is a name, the word God has spoken to us in these last days: Jesus Christ. He is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword. He cuts through all the protective layers we have put on. We want to believe that with enough money or education or goodness we will be able to secure our own future. And God’s Messiah stands before us, looking at us, loving and us, and saying, “No. Let go off all that and follow me.”

The good news of Jesus Christ sounds like bad news at first: we cannot save ourselves. But it is good news: we cannot save ourselves. And so we can stop trying and failing and trying harder and failing. We can stop running and we can start living as followers of Jesus on the way to the kingdom. He invites us to trust God with the work of saving us. He calls us to trust God with our lives and our future, and to begin living for God and for each other. He invites us to stop being anxiously self-centered and to find life by being attentive to God and to each other.

Ken Carder wrote in the Christian Century,

If our worth is based on what we know or own or achieve, we are always going to be insecure, for our value will depend on that which is precarious and temporary. Instead of loving one another, sharing with one another, nurturing the well-being of one another, we compete with one another, use one another, abuse one another and discard one another.[2]

A focus on what we can achieve easily leads to solitary, empty lives. But for those who follow Jesus on the way, a different world emerges, a new world. Jesus says that those who leave behind their self-made lives for the life God freely gives and shares will receive the kingdom. Entering the kingdom or inheriting eternal life is not a matter between a man and his God or a woman and her God; it involves us all, men and women, rich and poor, insiders and outsiders, and it transforms us all into a new family of brothers and sisters, a new household of equals, the whole people of God in the kingdom of God.

That is the call to which we seek to respond with our whole lives here at Vine Street, personally and communally. We learn to trust God completely with our lives and our future, and we learn to give ourselves completely to God’s work in the world.

You’ve heard and read about the prayer triplets, many of you have already signed up for them, and others are still waiting to hear from Dick and our Vision Team what exactly those triplets are going to be about. They will be about prayer, about turning to God with some of our biggest questions; and they will be about honest, vulnerable speech, about turning to each other and hearing each other out as we talk about our hopes and fears and the call of God. We will hear more details about the triplets today when we gather downstairs after worship, and every last detail receives its meaning from the long arc of God’s creative and redemptive mission: We are called to trust God completely with our lives and our future, and to give ourselves completely to God’s work in the world.

 


[1] Mk 10:15

[2] Kenneth L. Carder, “The Perils of Riches (Mk. 10:17-31),” The Christian Century, Sept. 24-Oct. 1, 1997, p. 831

The prayer of the righteous

The reading we just heard? Danielle calls it a veritable mine field of broken hopes and false expectations and (…) lost faith. “I don’t have any concrete evidence on this,” she says, “but I think this passage may be in the running to win a ‘Most Negative Spiritual Baggage’ award.” Can you hear her anger? I don’t have any spiritual baggage related to that text, but I didn’t grow up in a church where James got a lot of attention. My people were Paul-and-the-gospels people, as far as the New Testament is concerned. So I don’t have any spiritual baggage, but I wonder what kind of alarms went off in your heads as you were listening.

Danielle says, she can personally count a rather alarming number of conversations she’s had with faithful people who have felt that they’ve prayed their hearts out over people they’ve loved only to see them not be healed. So she starts getting quite nervous when she reads, “The prayer of faith will save the sick, and the Lord will raise them up.” She knows that this has been used to create some sort of guaranteed divine healing system – for people with access, that is. “The prayer of the righteous is powerful and effective,” Danielle reads. Ergo, with a logic cold as hell, if your prayer isn’t as powerful and effective as you needed it to be, your righteousness must be questionable. Danielle is about to scream at this point, but she waits until James, in her words, piles on the guilt by comparing all of us to Elijah. “‘Elijah was a human being like us!’ James says, ‘And HE was able to pray so powerfully that there was no rain in the whole wide world for three and a half years!’ Never mind that Elijah was a prophet. No, says James, he’s exactly like us. He is the most average human being ever. You should absolutely compare yourself to him, especially when someone you love is sick and your prayers aren’t magically working to fix them. Then you can feel guilty not only for your prayers clearly not being [offered] correctly, but also for not being ELIJAH. If this is James’s idea of a pep talk, I frankly think he fails.”[1]

If James knew about some of the ways he’s been read, he’d be very upset. More than anything, he wants to help shape congregations that are communities of a particular wisdom, congregations whose members really fulfill what he calls the royal law according to the scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”[2] James cares a lot about what we do with words, what we say and how we say it. Today’s passage contains the concluding lines of his letter, and each line addresses matters of speech like praying, singing songs of praise, confessing our sins to one another, praying for each other, and correcting one another.

James doesn’t explain, nor does he unfold lengthy arguments. He loves dispensing small packages of wisdom that recommend concrete actions; do this, and don’t do that. He believes that communities are shaped by concrete practices. Are any among you suffering? They should pray. Are any cheerful? They should sing songs of praise.The whole range of human experience is in view here, from any situation that diminishes a person’s life to moments when every aspect of life is imbued with joy. All of it is to be lived in the presence of God, to be brought before God in prayer and song. In prayer, life is put into words, spoken or sung, or into silence that is not the mere absence of words, but a fullness beyond them.

In prayer, all of life is lived and known in relationship with God. But another set of relationships is equally important for the communities of wisdom James envisions. Are any among you sick? he asks. And it’s not just sickness he has in mind here, but times when our strength is gone, whether it’s about our aching bodies, our tired spirits, or our anxious hearts. Suffering has a way of isolating us, be it that we just want to be alone when the shadows fall or that our daily routines of work and family responsibilities are being put on hold while for the rest of the world those routines go on. Suffering has a way of isolating us. Are any of you sick? he asks – they should call for the elders of the church and have them pray over them, anointing them with oil in the name of the Lord. James empowers the suffering ones – the sick, the weary, the discouraged – to summon the elders of the community. There are doctors, of course, and nurses, psychotherapists, pharmacists, life coaches and other specialists, but the whole community needs to be there with prayer and healing touch, the whole community, represented by the elders. And in this moment – you can imagine the suffering person in the middle of the room, on a chair perhaps or in bed, the entire community gathered around them in Spirit and several elders in person – in this moment James speaks of the prayer of faith that will save that person and of the Lord who will raise her up and of the forgiveness of sins.

What’s the forgiveness of sins doing here? James knows that when we suffer we can’t help but ask ourselves what we have done wrong to deserve this or to cause this. We carry guilt on our shoulders when we’re sick, wondering if it’s all because we didn’t exercise enough, or drank too much, or didn’t include enough kale in our diet. We carry guilt on our shoulders when we can’t get a job we actually might like, and we wonder if it’s all our fault because the things we enjoy doing don’t pay in what dad called the real world, or because we don’t have the right personality, or because we start sweating every time we walk into an interview. We carry guilt on our shoulders, the weight of the wrong we have done and the good we have left undone, and all of that is in the room, too. “Anyone who has committed sins will be forgiven,” writes James, anyone. “Therefore confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another, so that you may be healed.”

The shift is subtle, but crucial. Only a moment ago, all our attention was on the one person in the middle of the room, now it is on all of us and on the brokenness, the weakness and the failures that are part of who we have become, each and all of us; we recognize how far we all are from the glorious wholeness of life God intends for us;  and James encourages us to bring this moment, all of it, to speech through mutual confession and prayer for each other, so that we may be healed.

“The prayer of the righteous is powerful and effective,” he writes, not to suggest that some of us are better at offering prayers that deliver the desired results, but rather that when we confess our sins to each other and pray for each other, that is when we speak to each other, in the presence of God, about our brokenness, our weakness and our failures, and lift each other up in prayer, we will be healed. We are not saved by the prayer of faith, but through the relationships with God and with each other that are restored through faith and nurtured in our prayers.

Healing is not limited to a person who is suffering or a specific condition; it applies to the whole community and its wellbeing in every dimension - spiritual, physical, emotional, and social. Healing is not the same as curing; it is a relational mystery, a name for the concrete actions and practices that keep us connected when suffering threatens to fragment, isolate, and marginalize us.

It is a happy coincidence that we are having the Commissioning of our Elders on a Sunday when the scripture reading highlights a significant dimension of the ministry of elders as men and women of prayer. The same scripture, however, also highlights the power of vulnerable speech and prayer among all members of the community who seek to embody the royal law of love.

Most of you know that our congregation is seeking to perceive and understand more fully what it means for us to live as people of God in this city, in this age. The world has changed in dramatic ways, and our ministry may need to change dramatically as well, in order to remain a faithful part of God’s mission in the world. How it may need to change, how we may need to change, we do not and cannot know until we make time to listen to God together and to each other. In just a few days, you will receive an invitation to participate in a prayer triplet or triad that will meet six times over the next two months. Each triad, every time they meet, will listen prayerfully to a passage of scripture, pray for each other, and talk about a set of questions that will allow us as a community to perceive who it is God is calling us to be and what it is God is calling us to do. We are confident that this process of prayerful discernment in groups of three will allow us to make decisions related to this building and this land that will best serve our faithful response to God’s call. Each triad will create its own meeting schedule and decide where to meet. But I don’t want to talk about the technical details now.

I want to encourage each of you to sign up for a prayer triad when you receive the invitation. The work we are about to do in those groups is crucially important for our ministry in this city, and the magnitude of the task may seem overwhelming. But don’t let that intimidate you. The work you are about to participate in is God’s, and we may trust that the prayer of the righteous is powerful and effective. God will work with us, even us, to bring healing and wholeness to life.

 


[1] Danielle Shroyer, at http://thq.wearesparkhouse.org/featured/ordinary26bepistle/

[2] James 2:8

One such child

Abdullah Kurdi and his family had fled the violence in Syria two years ago. By the end of August they had made their way to the Aegean coast of Turkey. The smugglers had promised Abdullah Kurdi a motorboat for the trip from Turkey to Greece, a step on the way to a new life in Canada. Instead, they showed up with a 15-foot rubber raft that flipped in high waves, dumping Mr. Kurdi, his wife and their two small sons into the sea. Only Mr. Kurdi survived. His wife, Rehan and their two sons, Aylan and Ghalib, drowned. You may have seen the imgage of a lifeless child in a red shirt and dark shorts face down on a Turkish beach. It was 3-year-old Aylan, his round cheek pressed to the sand as if he were sleeping, except for the waves lapping his face. “Now I don’t want anything,” Mr. Kurdi said a day later, from Mugla, Turkey, after filling out forms at a morgue to claim the bodies of his family.  “Even if you give me all the countries in the world,” he said, “I don’t want them. What was precious is gone.”[1]

Nearly 12 million Syrians have been forced from their homes by the fighting – that’s the equivalent of the population of Ohio. Half are children. An entire generation of children have been forced to quit school. They are at risk of becoming ill, malnourished, abused, or exploited.[2] Most of them live in improvised camps in Syria, in Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq and Turkey. Many families try to make their way to Europe. You have heard the news. This past week, Hungarian police at the Serbian border drove migrants back with tear gas, pepper spray and water cannons.[3]

There’s so much fear. So much helplessness. So much political maneuvering.

*

“Whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me,” says Jesus, “and whoever welcomes me welcomes not me but the one who sent me.” We have heard the word how some have entertained angels unawares by showing hospitality to strangers.[4] I can’t help but visualize the scene at the border fence with razor wire, tear gas, pepper spray, water cannons, and the angels of heaven. And Jesus didn’t say, angels. “Whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me, and whoever welcomes me welcomes not me but the one who sent me.” Jesus has identified himself with the littlest ones among us, those of little or no status, and he tells us that welcoming one of them in his name we welcome the Maker of heaven and earth.

Jesus knows about our fears and our ambitions and our helplessness. The scene Mark describes for us takes place in Galilee. Jesus and the disciples are on the way, which is to say they’re on the way to Jerusalem; but it goes beyond geography, because they are on the way to the kingdom of God, and we are on the way with them. We believe that Jesus is God’s Messiah, the one who sets all things right, and like his first followers we are learning to trust him with our whole hearts. He’s been teaching us about what lies ahead for him. “The Son of Man is to be betrayed into human hands, and they will kill him, and three days after being killed, he will rise again.” Mark makes room for us in the story by telling us that the disciples did not understand what Jesus was saying and were afraid to ask him. Why were they afraid to ask? For the same reasons, I imagine, you and I are afraid to ask questions. We don’t want to look stupid in front of everybody. Even when we’re scared, confused and clueless, we still want to project confidence and make everybody else believe that we have it all together. We fake it till we make it.

Jesus, of course, doesn’t hesitate to ask us questions. “What were you talking about on the way?” And he asks not because he doesn’t know, but because he does. It appears that when we’re afraid to ask the difficult questions about the way of Jesus Christ, we end up talking about the usual stuff like who’s the greatest. We’re ambitious people, we strife for excellence, we study hard, we work hard, we’re competitive; we quickly absorb the unwritten rules of what adds to our status and what doesn’t, and we learn to act accordingly.

If we don’t ask questions about the way of Jesus Christ, we talk about seating arrangements at the great banquet and who’ll be at the head table, and who’s been with Jesus the longest, and who can recite from memory every word of the sermon on the mount, and who got to go up the mountain with Jesus, and who’ll be sitting at Jesus’ right and left in his glory.

“What were you talking about on the way?” he asks us, and there’s a long silence. The moment he talks with us, we know that the things that preoccupy our thoughts, our conversations and our work have little to do with him and his way in the world. We are very familiar with the ways of the world, whether we like it or not, and the old habits of acting and thinking are resilient. Three times in the gospel of Mark, Jesus talks about being rejected and betrayed, about being handed over, condemned, and killed, and about rising again after three days. Three times, not just because these difficult words don’t sink in easily; but because our life as disciples of Jesus is so profoundly shaped by following him on the way of loving surrender of self for the sake of God’s reign. Three times he tells us and we’re afraid to ask because we’re afraid he’s going to turn our world upside down. “Whoever wants to be first,” he says, “whoever wants to be first must be last of all and servant of all.” In our world, the ones at the top lord it over those at the bottom. But in the kingdom of God, earth and heaven do not touch at the top of the ladder, in the clouds of power, but at the bottom where Jesus stoops to wash the feet of all.

*

We argue about who is the greatest and Jesus puts a little child among us. Politicians pick up little children all the time, their PR people tell them it looks good on television and it makes them more likeable. But Jesus doesn’t pick up a child to draw attention to himself. He does it to draw our attention to the child. He does it to draw our attention away from our anxious obsession with status. He picks up a child to teach us the kingdom way.

In 1999, John Baptist Odama became the archbishop of Gulu, in northern Uganda. For years, a group calling themselves the Lord’s Resistance Army had been waging war against the Ugandan government; it also terrorized the civilian population, burning villages, killing and maiming civilians, and abducting children, tens of thousands of children, to replenish their fighting ranks. It was at the height of this violent eruption that Odama was installed as archbishop of Gulu.

Now the installation of an archbishop is very serious business. Talk about climbing up the ladder! Talk about status! Talk about authority! Not to mention the carefully laid out seating arrangements in the cathedral and at the reception following the service. Many powerful dignitaries were in attendance: a papal representative from Rome, the president of Uganda, various bishops, ministers and a host of others. All serious stuff. The symbols of the high office were laid out in the chancel, the ring, the mitre, the staff, and the pallium – all the regalia, all serious stuff.

But the new Archbishop had more important things on his mind. He took a child in his arms and asked her, “Do you like war?” The girl turned her head from side to side; no, she didn’t like war or anything about it. He then asked her, “Do you like peace?” and she nodded enthusiastically. The Archbishop, still holding the child in his arms, turned to the congregation and said, “This child has defined for us our pastoral ministry. I commit myself to work for the future that this child has defined, to eliminate war, build peace for the sake of this child, … so that the full humanity of this child might grow and flourish.”[5]

The kingdom of God is not about getting the best seat in the cathedral; it’s about noticing the little ones and welcoming them and letting them define our vision and work.

*

We all start out little, every single one of us. We all start out needing to be welcomed and held and loved, every single one of us. As we welcome the little and most vulnerable ones at our borders and in our communities, we also learn to welcome the vulnerable core of our own soul; we learn to embrace the little one within us.

“Whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me,” says Jesus, “and whoever welcomes me welcomes not me but the one who sent me.”

Welcome, welcome, welcome is woven into the fabric of this teaching like the holy, holy, holy sung by the angels in heaven.

Welcoming those who are not counted at the tables of greatness, we welcome Christ himself, and welcoming him, we welcome God to dwell among us.

 


[1] See http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/04/world/europe/syria-boy-drowning.html?_r=0

[2] See http://www.worldvision.org/news-stories-videos/syria-war-refugee-crisis#sthash.UIgKqLHo.dpuf

[3] http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/16/world/europe-migrant-crisis/index.html

[4] Hebrews 13:2

[5] See https://www.faithandleadership.com/sermons/emmanuel-katongole-receiving-such-one

Against the grain

Ben Dunlap was President of Wofford College in Spartanburg, South Carolina until 2013. When he started teaching there, in the early 90’s, he found, among the auditors in his classroom, a 90-year-old man, a Hungarian named Sandor Teszler, and he loved to tell his story. Mr. Teszler was a widower whose children had already died and whose grandchildren lived far away. He had been born in 1903 in the provinces of the old Austro-Hungarian Empire, in what later would become Yugoslavia. He was ostracized as a child, not because he was a Jew, but because he had been born with two club feet, a condition which, in those days, required institutionalization and a succession of painful operations throughout childhood. He went to the commercial business high school as a young man in Budapest, and after graduation he went into textile engineering and became a successful business man. He married and had two sons.

Once he was summoned in the middle of the night by the night watchman at one of his plants. The night watchman had caught an employee who was stealing socks – it was a hosiery mill, and he simply backed a truck up to the loading dock and was shoveling in mountains of socks. Mr. Teszler went down to the plant and confronted the thief and said, “But why do you steal from me? If you need money you have only to ask.” The night watchman, seeing how things were going and waxing indignant, said, “Well, we’re going to call the police, aren’t we?” But Mr. Teszler answered, “No, that will not be necessary. He will not steal from us again.”

Maybe he was too trusting; he stayed long after the Nazi Anschluss in Austria and even after the arrests and deportations began in Budapest. He took the simple precaution of having cyanide capsules placed in lockets that could be worn about the necks of himself and his family. And then one day, it happened: he and his family were arrested and they were taken to a death house on the Danube. In those early days of the Final Solution, it was handcrafted brutality; people were beaten to death and their bodies tossed into the river. But none who entered that death house had ever come out alive. In a twist you would not believe in a Steven Spielberg film the official who was overseeing this beating was the very man who had stolen socks from Mr. Teszler’s hosiery mill. The beating was brutal. Midway through the brutality, one of Mr. Teszler’s sons, Andrew, looked up and said, “Is it time to take the capsule now, Papa?” And the official, who afterwards vanishes from this story, leaned down and whispered into Mr. Teszler’s ear, “No, do not take the capsule. Help is on the way.” And then resumed the beating. Shortly afterwards a car arrived from the Swiss Embassy and they were spirited to safety.

At the end of the war, Mr. Teszler managed to take his family first to Great Britain, then to Long Island and then to the center of the textile industry in the American South, Spartanburg, South Carolina. And there, Mr. Teszler began all over again and once again was very successful. And then in the late 1950s, in the aftermath of Brown v. Board of Education, when the Klan was resurgent all over the South, Mr. Teszler said, “I have heard this talk before.” And he called his top assistant to him and asked, “Where would you say, in this region, racism is most virulent?”

“Well, Mr. Teszler, I reckon that would be Kings Mountain.”

“Good. Buy us some land in Kings Mountain and announce we are going to build a major plant there.”

The man did as he was told, and shortly afterwards, Mr. Teszler received a visit from the mayor of Kings Mountain, a white man. He greeted Mr. Teszler and said, “I trust you’re going to be hiring a lot of white workers.” Mr. Teszler told him, “You bring me the best workers that you can find, and if they are good enough, I will hire them.” He also received a visit from the leader of the black community, a minister, who said, “Mr. Teszler, I sure hope you’re going to hire some black workers for this new plant of yours.” He got the same answer: “You bring the best workers that you can find, and if they are good enough, I will hire them.”

Mr. Teszler hired 16 men: eight white, eight black. They were to be his seed group, his future foremen. He had installed the heavy equipment for his new manufacturing process in an abandoned store in the vicinity of Kings Mountain, and for two months these 16 men would live and work together, mastering the new process. He gathered them together after an initial tour of that facility and he asked if there were any questions. There was hemming and hawing and shuffling of feet, and then one of the white workers stepped forward and said, “Well, yeah. We’ve looked at this place and there’s only one place to sleep, there’s only one place to eat, there’s only one bathroom, there’s only one water fountain. Is this plant going to be integrated or what?” Mr. Teszler said, “You are being paid twice the wages of any other textile workers in this region and this is how we do business. Do you have any other questions?”

“No, I reckon I don’t.”

Two months later when the main plant opened and hundreds of new workers, white and black, poured in to see the facility for the first time, they were met by the 16 foremen, white and black, standing shoulder to shoulder. They toured the facility and were asked if there were any questions, and inevitably the same question arose: “Is this plant integrated or what?” One of the white foremen stepped forward and said, “You are being paid twice the wages of any other workers in this industry in this region and this is how we do business. Do you have any other questions?” And there were none. In one fell swoop, Mr. Teszler had integrated the textile industry in that part of the South. Ben Dunlap called it an achievement worthy of Mahatma Gandhi, conducted with the shrewdness of a lawyer and the idealism of a saint.[1]

It’s an encouraging story, although this being the Sunday before Labor Day, we can’t help but remember that most of the mills in the Carolinas are closed and those jobs are gone. The story also describes part of the context in which we hear the letter of James.

“My brothers and sisters, do you with your acts of favoritism really believe in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ?” The question is as old as the church and it still makes us uncomfortable. The word translated ‘favoritism’ is the biblical expression closest to our concept of discrimination. James wants us to think about what we’re doing when we treat people differently based on their outward appearance. The man in fine clothes, with rings on his fingers, is welcomed with a hospitality that comes across as a little too much, too submissive, too desperate. And the woman who walks in off the street, in dirty clothes, carrying a couple of plastic bags and pulling a little carry-on suitcase behind her? No one, including the preacher, assumes she’s here to worship.

“Have you not made distinctions among yourselves, and become judges with evil thoughts?” asks James. I’m glad he’s not sitting across from me. If he were sitting across from me and talking like that, I could only become defensive. But he’s not here, and he’s not asking his questions in person, and that allows us to hear them and to let them question us and to discover how much we respond without much thought to people’s outward appearance – their size, their age, their gender, their clothes, their hair, their skin. The little boy with two club feet in big orthopedic shoes. The black man in the parking lot. The fat girl in gym class. The quick judgment. The easy judgment. And the responses that follow, triggered by assumptions deeply embedded in our mental and cultural fabric. “Have you not made distinctions among yourselves, and become judges with evil thoughts?” James doesn’t ask his questions to expose and shame us. He asks to encourage us to speak and act and think against the grain.

On June 17, it was a Wednesday night, and this is another story from South Carolina that is not just about South Carolina, on June 17 a young white man walked into a church in Charleston, just in time for Bible study. The good people of Mother Emanuel welcomed him just like Jesus welcomes any of us, as a human being made in the image of God, as a beloved child of God, as an heir of the kingdom. They spoke and acted against the grain. Some of them, perhaps, thought, we will never know, if perhaps he had meant to go to the church down the street, one of the churches where white folk went in Charleston, but they welcomed him. They spoke and acted against the grain. They fulfilled the royal law according to the scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” They didn’t know and we didn’t know, until we heard the news, that this neighbor was intent on death. Few of us will ever forget the horror of the murder of nine church members in Bible study – in church. Love that doesn’t discriminate is a dangerous path to follow when racism, prejudice, and hate are so deeply embedded in our mental and cultural fabric. But love that doesn’t discriminate is also the power that heals us. Love that doesn’t discriminate is the love of God. “Mercy triumphs over judgment,” James reminds us. That is why he asks his questions, to encourage us to speak and act and think against the grain of judgment, especially the quick judgment, the easy judgment.

Leaders in the African Methodist Episcopal Church are determined to make the murder of the nine faithful witnesses at Mother Emanuel the moment that the church leads the United States into a genuine commitment to end racism – not just the direct, individual racism that causes one person to pick up a gun, but the broad systemic racism that nurtures such a motivation in the first place. Our brothers and sisters in the African Methodist Episcopal Church have called all Christians to offer prayers of confession with them today, to repent with them, and to commit ourselves with them to end the reign of racism and racially-motivated violence.

So this is where we are.We welcome with meekness the implanted word that has the power to save us, the word that questions us, not to expose and shame us, but to save us in mercy.[2] Love that doesn’t discriminate is a dangerous path to follow when racism, prejudice, and hate are so deeply embedded in our mental and cultural fabric. But love that doesn’t discriminate is also the power that heals us.

 


[1] TED talk 2007 http://www.ted.com/talks/ben_dunlap_talks_about_a_passionate_life

[2] See James 1:21

What enters the heart

Near the Cumberland River, between Hermitage Avenue and the interstate, in the middle of an industrial area, sits a small building where the Green Street Church of Christ meets for worship. Early Friday morning last week, a curious parade arrived there. It was a short convoy of pickup trucks, pulling four candy-colored tiny houses built on 6’x10’ trailers. A group of workers took down a section of fence so trucks and trailers could pass through the small churchyard’s too-narrow gate. What was going on? More than three years ago, the pastor explained, the first campers started appearing in the churchyard, homeless men and women looking for a safe place to pitch their tents, and the church couldn’t see how kicking them out could possibly be what God intended for them to do. Instead, they made it their mission to care for the rotating cast of residents, offering meals and water, portable toilets, and shelter inside the church when needed. The pastor was excited to upgrade a few of the residents’ makeshift lodgings, but he didn’t want too much media attention; he was and continues to be worried that might draw gawkers to the micro-village. But he dreams. He dreams of eventually replacing all the tents with micro-homes and building a permanent structure with showers, toilets, and a simple kitchen. “I think people will be excited to help,” he told the reporter from the Nashville Scene. At noon, they had a dedication ceremony, and Roger McGue, one of the residents whom many like to call “the mayor,” talked about how they doubted this day would actually come. “When you’re homeless, people promise you things all the time,” he said. Standing before the small crowd of donors, residents, and guests, he pointed to the people who initiated the project and said, “They got in it. They did this for us. Not for themselves. That’s what love is all about.”[1]

“Religion,” we read in the letter of James, “religion that is pure and undefiled before God, the Father, is this: to care for orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the world.” Orphans, widows and strangers are lifted up again and again in the law and the prophets as groups representing the most vulnerable members of the community, those easily pushed to the margins and forgotten “in their distress.” The move from a tent to a tiny plywood house may not seem like much of an upgrade, but it’s a little more protection from the cold and the rain, and it offers a little more privacy and a little more settled sense of place. My friend Samuel Lester calls this “bridge housing,” meaning it’s not permanent but it’s a step closer to having a place to call home. It’s no solution to Nashville’s affordable housing crisis or lack of mental health services, but it’s a step closer to living in community with neighbors for individuals and families pushed to the margins by the relentless demands of life in our society.

I read the story in the Nashville Scene because friends had posted links on facebook, and pictures of tiny houses are irresistible to me. I read and enjoyed the story and the pictures, but then I broke one of the great unwritten rules of the internet: stay away from the comment section, unless they pay a small army of enforcers who monitor what gets posted and delete the most hateful stuff. I started reading the comments, and I got mad and sad and sick all at once and I was this close to putting on the gloves and stepping into the boxing ring of digital punch lines to deliver a few blows myself, when I heard James whispering in the back of my mind, “You must understand this, my beloved: let everyone be quick to listen, slow to speak, slow to anger; for your anger does not produce God’s righteousness. Therefore rid yourselves of all sordidness and rank growth of wickedness, and welcome with meekness the implanted word that has the power to save your souls.” Bridling your tongue, I heard him say, is not just about watching what you say for the sake of others or lifting up the level of discourse from the gutter at least to the street; it’s about learning to speak from the heart that has become a home for the word of God. Bridling your tongue is about learning not just to react to the ugliness and meanness dressed up as outrage with equal ugliness and meanness, but to respond to it with words that reintroduce the capacity to bless.

James urges us to be doers of the word, and not merely hearers who deceive ourselves. He’s echoing the teaching of Jesus in the sermon on the mount, “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven.”[2] The proper way to hear the word is to obey. The proper way to hear is to respond with action. The word is, “You shall not commit adultery,” and to obey is to not commit adultery. The word is, “Love your neighbor as yourself,” and to obey is to love those in need of a neighbor. The word is, “You shall not murder,” and to obey is to not murder. To do the word means not to do what it prohibits or do what it commands. That seems simple enough, but is it?

Jesus teaches in the sermon on the mount, “You have heard that it was said to those of ancient times, ‘You shall not murder’; and ‘whoever murders shall be liable to judgment.’ But I say to you that if you are angry with a brother or sister, you will be liable to judgment; and if you insult a brother or sister, you will be liable to the council; and if you say, ‘You fool,’ you will be liable to the hell of fire.”[3]

The proper way to hear and do the word is to obey the full depth of its meaning. The proper way to hear the word is to welcome with meekness the implanted word that is Jesus himself.  He’s not only the teacher who knows the full depth of the word’s meaning and instructs his disciples by declaring, “You have heard that it was said…, but I say to you.” His very life, his compassion and forgiveness, his story, his death and resurrection is the full depth of the word’s meaning. He is what God says.

Bridling your tongue, then, is to let Jesus speak; to give voice with your own words to his power to forgive and redeem and make whole. Bridling your tongue is learning to let the living Christ speak the truth from your heart.

I was drawn to the heart language in the readings for today, particularly in the Psalm and the Gospel reading from Mark, after Wednesday night when I first heard about reporter Allison Parker and photographer Adam Ward who had been murdered during a live newscast. I was heartbroken. I thought about their families, their fiancees, their co-workers and friends. The pain they must feel, the numbness, the anger; and I prayed for them. I also thought about the man who shot them dead and captured the shooting on camera and posted the clip on social media before he killed himself. I thought about his heart and how it gave birth to such violence; and I prayed for him. And I thought about the people who watched the clip he had posted and who then shared it with their networks – why, I do not know; and I prayed for them. Everything happened so fast, and we’ve barely begun to process what happened, when the next thing happens, demanding attention and understanding and soul strength and response. What is happening to your heart in all this? What is happening to your heart when the world floods in on you?

Mark tells the story of Jesus in a debate with other Jewish leaders about ritual purity, a debate that didn’t go particularly well because it ended when it had barely begun.

The Pharisees and scribes from Jerusalem argued that avoiding contact with things considered ritually unclean or washing properly after they had been in contact with such things allowed them to maintain their calling as God’s holy people.

Jesus told his disciples, “Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile, since it enters, not the heart but the stomach, and goes out into the sewer? It is what comes out of a person that defiles. For it is from within, from the human heart, that evil intentions come: fornication, theft, murder, adultery, avarice, wickedness, deceit, licentiousness, envy, slander, pride, folly. All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.”[4]

No argument there; that’s solid Torah teaching. We read in Genesis, “The Lord saw that the wickedness of humankind was great in the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of their hearts was only evil continually.”[5] Evil and defilement stem from places rather deeply embedded within our very selves. They stem from the heart, which in Scripture is the seat of our imagining, reasoning, and willing.

No argument there, especially since we all tend to find it much easier to identify evil in others than to search our own hearts. But to me, that doesn’t end the debate. The first part of Jesus’ teaching is what continues to bother me. The claim that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile, since it enters, not the heart but the stomach, and goes out into the sewer. What about the things we watch with our eyes and hear with our ears? What about the hateful words in the comments section? They’re not material like food or drink, but they certainly go into a person from outside and they do enter the heart.

The work we do or don’t get to do, the house we sleep in, the school we go to, the scriptures we read – everything shapes the heart, in evil ways that keep us from being who we are created to be in the image of God, or in holy ways that make us alive in communion with God and God’s entire creation.

Our hearts are defiled, wounded and broken in more ways than we can know, but Jesus is not afraid to brush against and touch those places to heal them.

What do we do then in this mad, beautiful world? We pray, “Create in me a clean heart, O God, and put a new and right spirit within me.”[6] We pray and we welcome with meekness the implanted word that has the power to save us. We welcome the word and we care for orphans and widows in their distress.

 


[1] http://www.nashvillescene.com/pitw/archives/2015/08/24/following-a-caravan-of-micro-houses-for-the-homeless-through-downtown-nashville

[2] Matthew 7:21

[3] Matthew 5:21-22

[4] Mark 7:1-23

[5] Genesis 6:5; see also Genesis 8:21

[6] Psalm 51:10

Armored intervention

Anne Moody died on February 5 at her home in Gloster, Mississippi. She was 74. A daughter of sharecroppers, Essie Mae Moody was born on September 15, 1940, in Centreville, Mississippi; she began calling herself Anne in her teens. After attending Natchez Junior College on a basketball scholarship, the young Ms. Moody enrolled in Tougaloo College near Jackson, Mississippi, from which she received a bachelor’s degree in 1964.

I didn’t know Anne and I doubt any of you did. But you may have seen her picture in the paper or in a history text book. As a young woman, Ms. Moody was active in civil rights efforts in Mississippi, and in May 1963 she and another activist, Joan Trumpauer, were part of a racially mixed group in a sit-in at a lunch counter at Woolworth’s in Jackson.

Anne Moody in 1963 being harassed alongside John Salter and Joan Trumpauer at a Woolworth’s. Credit Fred Blackwell/Jackson Daily News, via Associated Press

I only know of Ms. Moody, Joan Trumpauer, and John Salter because I saw a photograph of them sitting at the counter, surrounded by a mob of mostly young white men who, with smiles on their faces, had been pouring condiments on the three. “I was snatched from my stool by two high school students,” Anne Moody recounted in her 1968 memoir, Coming of Age in Mississippi. “I was dragged about 30 feet toward the door by my hair when someone made them turn me loose.” She continued: “The mob started smearing us with ketchup, mustard, sugar, pies and everything on the counter. Soon Joan and I were joined by John Salter, but the moment he sat down he was hit on the jaw with what appeared to be brass knuckles. Blood gushed from his face and someone threw salt into the open wound.” [1]

No one intervened. The ones who didn’t participate directly in the abuse, stood by and looked on. I looked at the picture and wondered: Had I been there, could I have trusted myself to not just watch or walk away but speak up or perhaps sit next to the three on one of the vacant bar stools?

They looked so calm, the three; so determined and focused on what they were there to do. They weren’t fighting the jeering young white men, they were fighting a monster. They were fighting an evil that had become institutionalized in politics, education, and commerce, in every aspect of U.S. society, beginning with slavery and still holding us in its grip to this day. They were fighting racism—without a sword, a helmet, or a shield. Some of the men and women who participated in the sit-ins in Greensboro, Nashville, Jackson and elsewhere were people of prayer. They entered the struggle armed with their passion for justice and their prayers, and they were able to stand firm against the spitting, the taunting, the pushing, beating and hair-pulling.

In his letter to the Ephesians, the apostle uses the image of body armor. It was something the letter’s first audiences likely saw daily, not in their closets, but on the Roman soldiers who with force maintained Rome’s peace in the cities and provinces around the Mediterranean. Followers of Jesus will find it most difficult to imagine their Lord in full-body armor; ourselves perhaps, yes, we can see ourselves carrying and wearing a little extra protection. We know the desire, when someone strikes us on our right cheek, pours ketchup on our hair or squirts mustard in our face, we know the burning desire to scream insults at them or strike back with the fist or a coffee mug. But the apostle isn’t just referring to the daily presence of Roman soldiers as an illustration or an example as though the authority they enforced with violence had anything to do with the power of God who raised Jesus from the dead and seated him far above all rule and authority and power and dominion. The apostle has listened to Isaiah:

The Lord looked, and it displeased him that there was no justice. He saw that there was no one, and was appalled that there was no one to intervene; so his own arm brought him victory, and his righteousness upheld him. He put on righteousness like a breastplate, and a helmet of salvation on his head; he put on garments of vengeance for clothing, and wrapped himself in fury as in a mantle (Is 59:15-17).

In Isaiah, the language indicates that there was no one to intervene, and so God fights for justice alone. In Ephesians, the community of the faithful takes up God’s armor and enters the struggle against spiritual forces larger than flesh and blood. “Put on the whole armor of God,” wrote the apostle, “so that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For our struggle is not against enemies of blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers of this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places” (6:11-12). Christ is already seated far above those powers and forces, meaning his dominion of vulnerable love and reconciling forgiveness has overcome their capacity to corrupt and destroy; they have already lost, no matter how violently they resist the unity of all things in Christ, things in heaven and things on earth.

In South Africa, back in the 80’s, when the government canceled a political rally against apartheid, Desmond Tutu led a worship service in St. George’s Cathedral. The walls of the church were lined with soldiers and riot police in full body armor, carrying guns and bayonets, ready to close the assembly down as soon as the order came in. Bishop Tutu began to speak of the evils of the apartheid system—how the rulers and authorities that propped it up were doomed to fail. He pointed a finger at the police who were there to record his words: “You may be powerful—very powerful—but you are not God. God cannot be mocked. You have already lost.” Then, flashing the radiant Tutu smile, the bishop came out from behind the pulpit and began bouncing up and down with glee. “Therefore, since you have already lost, we are inviting you to join the winning side.” The crowd roared and began to dance.[2]

The winning side is not either us or them; the winning side is the new humanity whose peace is Christ. The winning side are all of us whom Christ has reconciled to God in one body through the cross.

“Put on the whole armor of God, so that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.”

I have no trouble getting excited about the triumph of Christ over powers and principalities, over any systems, structures or institutions that claim quasi-divine status and obedience. But I am wary of talk of spiritual warfare. There simply are too many examples where the rhetoric of spiritual warfare against the dark forces of evil turned into violence against individuals and groups of people like Jews, heretics, or witches who had been identified as agents of the devil. We are not to arm ourselves for attack or oppression or to establish a theocracy. We cannot proclaim the gospel of peace with the sword. We are to fasten the belt of truth around our waist, and the truth is that in Christ we are rooted and grounded in love. We are to put on the breastplate of righteousness, and righteousness is God’s not ours, so we must depend completely on God. We are to take the shield of faith, not some bigger, stronger bow that would allow us to shoot flaming arrows farther and more accurately than the evil one. We are to take the helmet of salvation, and salvation is God’s work, not ours. Every piece of armor we are urged to carry is designed to help us stand up and stand firm and stand together and withstand—not to overpower, never to overpower, but to subvert the powers and principalities that still demand our allegiance and obedience, to subvert and topple them with the vulnerable love of Christ.

When Anne Moody’s autobiography was published in 1968, Senator Edward M. Kennedy wrote in a review that it “brings to life the sights and smells and suffering of rural poverty in a way seldom available to those who live far away.” And he added: “Anne Moody’s powerful and moving book is a timely reminder that we cannot now relax in the struggle for sound justice in America or in any part of America. We would do so at our peril.”

That was in 1968, almost fifty years ago, and the struggle for sound justice in America isn’t over, not in our schools, nor in our streets, our court houses, or our neighborhoods. The wounds of slavery will not heal until we begin to take off the many layers of armor we have put on to protect ourselves from being honest with ourselves and with each other. We need to take off the helmet of “slavery was long ago, it’s time to move on now” and the breastplate of “that’s their problem not mine” and the shield of “it’s really bad down in Mississippi, not here, not where I live.”

The armor the apostle urges us to put on instead doesn’t protect us from each other, but allows us to be truthful in love. “As shoes for your feet put on whatever will make you ready to proclaim the gospel of peace.” This proclamation doesn’t mean trying our hardest to make others more like ourselves, but to let Christ make us all new and whole.

Years after she had published her autobiography, Anne Moody was asked why she hadn’t written more books. “In the beginning I never really saw myself as a writer,” she said. “I was first and foremost an activist in the civil rights movement in Mississippi.” But then she added, “I came to see through my writing that no matter how hard we in the movement worked, nothing seemed to change. (…) We were like an angry dog on a leash that had turned on its master. It could bark and howl and snap, and sometimes even bite, but the master was always in control.”[3]

The struggle for sound justice in America isn’t over, not in our schools, nor in our streets, our court houses, or our neighborhoods. None of us are who we really are in Christ, as long as there is among us even one woman, man, or child who sense that their lives don’t matter  and who experience their struggle for justice and wholeness as a dog’s fruitless pull against the master’s leash.

“Put on the whole armor of God, so that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.”

 


[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/18/books/anne-moody-author-of-coming-of-age-in-mississippi-dies-at-74.html

[2] Jim Wallis, quoted in John Ortberg, “Roll call.” The Christian Century 120, no. 16 (August 9, 2003): 17.

[3] See note 1.

Join the song

Be careful then how you live (Eph 5:15). That’s a pretty neat and concise line, isn’t it? Everything important has been said already. Everything God has done has been said already. Now it’s your turn; be careful then how you live.

Nancy and I have been talking about college application essays and she told me about the kid who got into Harvard with an essay of four syllables. “Why do you want to go to Harvard?” was the topic. The kid wrote, “I want to learn.” When what needs doing has been done and what needs saying has been said, you can be brief.

Life, according to the letter to the Ephesians, is now the life of reconciliation in Christ. What needs doing has been done. All of creation, things on earth and things in heaven are on a trajectory toward shalom. Be careful then how you live. Remember that you have been chosen and called by God, and live worthy of your calling. Remember that you, all of you and the ones you still call them, rembember that you are one body in Christ, and live accordingly. Remember that you are being rooted and grounded in love – not in sin, or fear, or shame – remember and live.

Wake up, sleeper! Rise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you (5:14). Live as a child of that light, in that light. Everything else is commentary: Don’t live foolishly, but wisely. Don’t live in ignorance, but in the knowledge of God’s will for creation, that is, to bring unity to all things in heaven and on earth, in Christ (1:9-10). Make the most of the time because it is precious. Align every moment of your life with God’s movement toward the glorious fulfilment of creation’s purpose. Do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery.

You could have a little fun with that part of the letter, pointing out that getting drunk with beer or Jack must apparently be OK since they aren’t mentioned here and where the scriptures are silent, we are silent. We could have a little fun with that verse. A Methodist colleague of mine grew up as an heir of that tradition’s tee-totaling commitment; he even avoided “butter rum” LifeSavers: the flavoring, he was told, might lead him down a path of ruinous temptation.[1]

We could have a little fun with that verse. But if you struggle with alcohol addiction or if you grew up in a family where excessive drinking triggered destructive behavior or if you even just heard how excessive drinking increases the likelihood of sexual assault exponentially or if you have talked to men and women who found themselves in prison or on the street because of the demon drink, if any of those apply to you, you may not feel like having a little fun with the letter’s cautionary instruction. In fact, you may want to suggest that we broaden the term wine to include all drugs, all habits, all dependencies that ultimately fill us with numbness and prevent us from being filled with the fullness of God (3:19), which is the fullness of love and life. Do not get drunk with fake life, for that is debauchery; but be filled with the Spirit. Be filled with the fullness of God by the Spirit. Fake life may sparkle in the cup and go down smoothly, but at last it bites like a snake and leaves you numb; being filled with it is like being drained of life that is real.

Being filled with the Spirit also has its intoxicating effects: You sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs to each other, you sing and make melody to the Lord in your hearts, you give thanks to God the Father at all times and for everything in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, and you are subject to one another out of reverence for Christ. Being filled with the Spirit causes all kinds of singing and music to erupt, thanksgiving to rise, and mutual submission to flourish. Being filled with the Spirit causes our hearts to sing, our lips to brim over, and our life together to sound and feel and smell and look and taste like heaven. Being filled with the Spirit our life turns into worship, from the center of our being and with our whole being. For a moment, heaven and earth are one as they are meant to be and as they will be when God has completed the work of redemption. Be careful then how you live, because any moment can be that moment when fullness shines through.

Perhaps you wondered why we have included a couple more psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs in today’s worship service. Are you still wondering?

Over the next few weeks we will have a series of educational programs on worship with a variety of teachers, every Sunday morning at 9, in our fellowship hall. Because our reading from Ephesians invites us not only to sing, but also to reflect on singing as an essential part of our life and worship, I wanted to share a handful of brief texts about singing from various generations of the church. One of these texts will take us back all the way to the beginning of creation, so I don’t need to go that far.

I.

The first Christians worshiped in homes, and Paul, in 1 Corinthians 14, gives us a glimpse of what happened in their gatherings:

“When you come together, each one has a hymn, a lesson, a revelation, a tongue, or an interpretation” (14:26).

Among that first generation of believers, they didn’t worry about what to wear to church or how long the service would be; they thought about what to bring, and apparently to bring a hymn meant to sing it. And those who brought a lesson or a prayer also sang, because the scriptures were chanted rather than spoken.

II.

Four generations later, Tertullian (c. 170-225), a famous Christian writer from North Africa, described what happened in their gathering:

“After the washing of hands and the lighting of lamps, each is urged to come into the middle and sing to God, either from sacred scriptures or from his own invention.”[2]

How about that? What if you were too shy to step into the middle and sing? Could you perhaps just stay in the circle and hum or clap? He doesn’t mention anything about that.

III.

A couple of hundred years later, when there were buildings designed specifically for Christian worship, Bishop Ambrose of Milan (4th century) said in a sermon,

“This is a symphony, when there resounds in the church a united concord of differing ages and abilities as if of diverse strings. [This symphony] joins those with differences, unites those at odds and reconciles those who have been offended, for who will not concede to him with whom one sings to God in one voice?”[3]

Beside the power of our praise for building up the body of Christ, uniting differing abilities in congregational song was a great development for worshipers convinced they cannot sing (I won’t name any names), because they could blend into the symphony of praise with the saints and angels, regardless of what the pitch was in heaven. Together we sound magnificent!

IV.

Augustine, also from North Africa, was very concerned about not letting the sweetness of melodies distract from the sacred words of songs, but then he surprised everybody with statements sounding very pentecostal:

“Do not search for words, as if you could find a lyric which would give God pleasure. Sing to [God] “with songs of joy.” This is singing well to God, just singing with songs of joy. But how is this done? You must first understand that words cannot express the things that are sung by the heart. Take the case of people singing while harvesting in the fields or in the vineyards or when any other strenuous work is in progress. Although they begin by giving expression to their happiness in sung words, yet shortly there is a change. As if so happy that words can no longer express what they feel, they discard the restricting syllables. They burst out into a simple sound of joy, of jubilation. Such a cry of joy is a sound signifying that the heart is bringing to birth what it cannot utter in words. Now, who is more worthy of such a cry of jubilation than God (…), whom all words fail to describe? If words will not serve, and yet you must not remain silent, what else can you do but cry out for joy? Your heart must rejoice beyond words, soaring into an immensity of gladness, unrestrained by syllabic bonds.”[4]

That is very good news for those of us who know the first verse of some hymns, but little else, and can’t see a thing without reading glasses – we don’t need to pretend to be singing along with everybody else by mouthing all the words, no, we sing joyfully and lustily with A’s and U’s and O’s, unrestrained by syllabic bonds.

V.

One more voice, this one from the first half of the 20th century. Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote in Life Together,

“‘Sing to the Lord a new song,’ the Psalter enjoins us again and again. It is the Christ-hymn, new every morning, that the family fellowship strikes up at the beginning of the day, the hymn that is sung by the whole Church of God on earth and in heaven, and in which we are summoned to join. God has prepared for himself one great song of praise throughout eternity, and those who enter the community of God join in this song. It is the song that the ‘morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy’ at the creation of the world (Job 38:7). It is the victory song of the children of Israel after passing through the Red Sea, the Magnificat of Mary after the annunciation, the song of Paul and Silas in the night prison, the song of the singers on the sea of glass after their rescue, the ‘song of Moses the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb’ (Revelation 15:3). It is the new song of the heavenly fellowship.”[5]

Christ has made us his own. Let us be careful then how we live; let us join the song.

 


[1] L. Gregory Jones, “Trouble brewing.” The Christian Century 123, no. 17, p. 35.

[2] OxHCW, 770.

[3] OxHCW, 773.

[4] SBM, 61.

[5] SBM, 136.

Drop the pseudo

The second congregation I served was in Erzingen, a village in the south of Germany, on the Swiss border; lovely country, hills covered with vineyards; on clear days I could see the the Alps to the south. The bishop had told me the people there weren’t quick to embrace newcomers, but, like a good brick oven, once they had warmed up they would stay warm for a long time. The story I want to tell you, though, has nothing to do with the beauty of the land or the slow-burning love of its people.

The hospital was a few miles down the road, in the town where most of the stores were and the high schools and the doctor’s offices. One day I drove there to visit a parishioner, and when I walked into the room her doctor was with her, so I told her I’d be back in a few minutes. At the end of the hallway was a glass door that led to a small patio, and I liked the idea of sitting in the sun for a moment while I was waiting. So I stepped out on the patio and was about to close the door, when I noticed a man walking up from a room down the hall; dressed in a hospital gown, he was pushing an IV pole with a couple of bags. “Ah, looks like you want to get some fresh air, too,” I said, holding the door for him, but he didn’t respond. He stood close to the wall, rearranging the IV lines that had gotten a bit tangled, and then he reached into the pocket of his gown and pulled out a device that looked like a small, electric razor. He held it to his throat and I heard a voice like a robot’s say, “Thank you.”

“Throat cancer,” he said, pointing to a hole in his throat through which he breathed in and out. Then he reached again into the pocket of his gown and pulled out a pack of cigarettes. He took one and the next thing I noticed was the size of the hole in his throat was just big enough to hold a filter cigarette. He had a smoke on the patio and I tried hard not to stare. How many times a day, I wondered, did he step out there just to give his body the nicotine it craved?

Taking off your shoes and pants, your shirt and undies and putting on a hospital gown is a lot easier than changing your habits. It’s easy to talk or write about change, as Paul did in this letter, “Put away your former way of life that was part of the person you once were. Instead, renew the thinking in your mind by the Spirit and clothe yourself with the new person.” But if change really were as easy as pulling a fresh shirt from the closet and putting it on, Paul wouldn’t have written about it. He knows that our new self is more than a matter of insight, personal reinvention, and will power. He writes to remind us that we become who we are meant to be not in solitary pursuit of whatever we perceive perfection to be, but rather together in the body of Christ. Our newness in Christ, the new humanity we are in Christ, has profound personal consequences for each and all of us, but it is a reality of cosmic proportions, not just another self-help program.

In Christ we are no longer condemned to live under the reign of sin and death. We are chosen and called to live according to the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness. That life is already ours because Christ has made us his own, embracing every last one of us as his sister and brother, regardless of what the reign of sin and death has done to us. Regardless of what we have done to each other under their reign, he embraces us for the sake of true righteousness and true holiness. I emphasize true, because for some of us righteousness immediately triggers images of self-righteous hypocrites, and holiness sounds to many ears like sanctimonious arrogance. And as if he saw that coming, the apostle writes, “So then, putting away falsehood, let all of us speak the truth to each other.” He knows we’ve gotten used to wearing masks under the regime of fear that is the reign of sin and death. We’ve gotten used to wearing masks and masquerading around each other. We’ve gotten used to living as pseudo people. “So then, putting away pseudo,” writes the apostle, “let all of us speak the truth to each other for we belong to each other as members of one body.” Putting away bogus, sham, phony, mock, fake, false, pretend, and put-on let us speak the truth to each other. That’s a big deal. The apostle has a lot to say about anger and the devil, and about thievery and work in this portion of his letter, but before he gets to any of that, he says, “Drop the pseudo, be real.” That’s how we live into the life that is already ours because Christ has made us his own. We drop the masks. We stop masquerading and pretending. We allow ourselves to be the broken human beings we are and we allow the Spirit of God to heal us and clothe us anew.

On Thursday evenings, whenever I can, I go out to Riverbend prison to be part of a group of insiders and outsiders who learn together. We meet from 6 to 7:45; in the spring and fall we have a class where all of us are teachers and students, and in the weeks and months between semesters, we get together and let the conversation take us where it wants to go. We always do a round at the beginning where one of us asks a question and all of us respond; and the questions are not about our favorite food or our dream vacation.

“What gives you strength?”

“Where is your heart right now?”

“How do you keep hope alive?”

We go around the circle; we listen and speak; if any don’t want to respond, they say, “I pass;” but that doesn’t happen often. We talk and we listen, and the responses we hear can be deep, touching, funny, surprising and sad, but they rarely feel pseudo. The insiders, some of them have been in prison for fifteen and more years, have stopped pretending being somebody they are not, and that creates a space for us outsiders who come and go, to be real and vulnerable as well. We allow ourselves and each other to be the broken human beings we are and we allow the Spirit of God to heal us and clothe us anew.

John says, for him it’s like going to church. For me, it’s a gift and a challenge not to let that intimidating high fence, topped with coils of razor wire be a dividing wall totally separating “them” from “us.” Every time I look at that fence, the verse from Ephesians 2 comes to mind, “[Christ] is our peace; in his flesh he has made both groups into one and has broken down the dividing wall, that is, the hostility between us” (Eph 2:14). That little group at Riverbend is a community of reconciliation, and being part of it has taught me dimensions of being a member in the body of Christ that I doubt I could have learned anywhere else. In Christ we become who we are meant to be as people made in the likeness of God not by hiding from each other or excluding each other, but by turning toward each other in truth.

“Let no evil talk come out of your mouths,” writes the apostle, “but only what is useful for building up (…) so that your words may give grace to those who hear.” Let no evil talk come out of your mouths. That’s not the same as, “If you can’t say something nice, don’t say nothing at all,” which Thumper said, according to Disney. Words that give grace to those who hear aren’t necessarily nice or warm and fuzzy, but they are never violent or hateful. They emerge from the love that is building up the body of Christ, and speaking them contributes to the body’s growth toward fullness and wholeness.

We talk a lot about free speech, and rightly so, and we debate passionately if freedom of speech also protects hate speech. We have known for generations that words matter. “The words of the reckless pierce like swords, but the tongue of the wise brings healing,” our ancestors wrote in the book of Proverbs (12:18) for future generations to know and remember. Words build up and tear down, they wound or heal, they may give grace or condemn.

The apostle urges us to consider a different kind of freedom of speech. Because Christ has bound himself to us in love, we are bound to him and to the promise of life he has opened for us in his death and resurrection. We are free to be real, because he knows and loves us. We are free to speak non-violently, because his Spirit inspires us. We are free to speak the truth in love, cleaning the verbal air at the office or at school from sexist and racist talk, because we are not afraid. We practice holy speech, as odd and out-of-date that may sound at first. We practice speech that emerges from the deep love that constitutes the body of Christ. Speaking words that give grace to those who hear we contribute to their growth and our own toward the fullness and wholeness whose measure is Christ; we are changed.

Now to him who by the power at work among us and within us is able to accomplish abundantly far more than all we can ask or imagine, to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus to all generations, forever and ever. Amen.

Unity maintenance

Is it really August already? I feel like I’ve been locked in the basement for a while, and when I climbed up the stairs and out into the sunlight, blinking and squinting in the white glare, I realized July had pretty much evaporated; at the end of June I fell into a wormhole and on Thursday I emerged on the other side. I do vaguely remember, though, that I spent more than a week chained to my desk, reading books I wish somebody had pointed out to me years ago and some books I wish had never been written and writing papers of varying length and profundity about all of them. Then I spent two weeks with twenty-two colleagues in a windowless room with an enormous white board covering the entire length of one wall.

Speaking of which, I wish I had a white board to draw a Venn diagram; in case you’re wondering, that’s a set of overlapping circles that help you see things that are difficult to grasp in words, like the difference between dweebs, dorks, geeks, and nerds.[1] You see, dweebs combine social ineptitude with intelligence, while geeks combine obsession with intelligence, and dorks combine social ineptitude with obsession. Nerds, however, according to our imaginary Venn diagram, represent a perfect balance of intelligence, obsession, and social ineptitude. Why am I telling you all this? Because the twenty-two of us in that windowless room at Lipscomb were totally geeking out. Imagine four afternoons of four hours and four verses of scripture each, and at the end of the day, each day, the white board is covered with scribbles, triangles and arrows representing the theory of everything and each of the twenty-two sits back in their chair and, after a quick stretch, declares, “This was awesome.” So, how was your July?

We heard a wonderful passage from the beginning of the second half of the letter to the Ephesians, and there’s a part of me that wishes we had four hours and a white board, because it’s such a rich passage. But we’re not here to study, we’re here to worship God and to listen deeply for the word of God for us in Scripture, surrendering to it with receptive hearts and inspired minds, so that we may embody it in our life together, whether we’re together or apart. The first part of the letter is an invitation to join in praising and thanking God for uniting us with Christ, for breaking down the dividing wall between God’s people Israel and the nations,

for making members of the household of God of all who once were strangers to the covenants of promise, and for creating from the two who once were ‘us’ and ‘them’ one new humanity in Christ. The first part of the letter is an invitation to join in praising and thanking God for gathering up all things in Christ, things in heaven and things on earth, for the redemption of life from the powers of sin and death. This is who we are, God’s own people, a temple of the Lord, the body of Christ on earth, a people called to live to the praise of God’s glory. It’s like we’ve each been given a new first name, the first thing we ourselves and the whole world needs to know about us before anything else and after: our new name is child of God. And so we sing and thank God for giving us a new identity that is rooted and grounded in love, and not in fear or guilt or shame or income or education.

So, if this is who we are, we ask, how are we to live? And apparently Paul knew this question would be hanging in the air after we’ve thanked God for what God has done.What are we to do? Paul doesn’t jump right into the second half of the letter that answers that question in both its personal and communal dimensions; he ends the first half with a prayer:

Now to him who by the power at work within us is able to accomplish abundantly far more than all we can ask or imagine, to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus to all generations, forever and ever. Amen.

Even when we’re ready to ask, “What are we to do?” and go to work, even then, or perhaps especially then, we are to remember that the work is God’s and we are called to be participants in it. And what are we to do? “Make every effort to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace,” writes Paul.

That’s called maintenance work, isn’t it? That’s a bit of a downer for those of us who like to think of ourselves as kingdom builders, isn’t it? We just finished embroidering with gold thread our new name on our white robes, and now we’re given a blue shirt with our new name over the left chest pocket flap, and on the other side, just above the right chest pocket, it says, “Unity Maintenance.”

“Lord, I thought you might need me to be an elder or a teacher, or an evangelist, pastor, bishop, or deacon.”

“I might need you to fulfill any of those functions,” said the Lord, “but that’s the shirt you’re going to wear.”

Unity maintenance. The way Paul puts it in his letter, “I urge you then – I, the prisoner in the Lord – to lead a life worthy of the calling to which you have been called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love.” Unity maintenance. Not unity politics or unity management or unity by executive decree. Unity maintenance. Humble, gentle, patient; putting up with people who are so hard to put up with; changing the world by letting the love of God transform our hearts. Unity maintenance. One body. One Spirit. One hope. One Lord. One faith. One baptism. One God of all. 7x1=perfect unity, reflecting the unity of God. Perhaps you get a little nervous when you hear unity talk like that, I do, because I worry about totalitarian fantasies that wipe out difference. But this is no program or party platform; this is a unity far beyond our imagining; this is a body in which every member does its part to promote the body’s growth in building itself up in love; this is a community gifted with all that is needed to equip the saints for their work with God.

Since we’re talking about maintenance work, you may think that equipping is about equipment. But equipping is not just about giving somebody the right kind of tools or helping them develop the set of skills needed to accomplish a goal. That’s part of it, but not all of it. The word translated equipping is also used for the setting of broken bones or fostering healing, for making something whole and strong. The word makes an appearance in the accounts of Jesus calling fishermen to be his followers. James and John were in their boat mending the nets when Jesus called them to a life of discipleship.[2] Mending and equipping are the same word in Greek, so to equip the saints for the work of ministry is about more than training; it’s about healing; it’s about weaving wholeness where life is frayed; it’s about repairing what is broken instead of writing it off; it’s about restoring rather than discarding what is fractured; it’s about each and every one of us being needed and indispensable for what God is up to in the world. And so we don’t go looking for the church gear peddlers at the ministry fair who build flashy displays of their latest and greatest apps and gadgets; we go looking for each other. God wants Christ to have a body on earth, and you and I and all the others who long for life that is real will do. We will do. Not because we’re worthy or holy or grown-up by any measure we use, but because we are beloved and called and gifted according to the measure of Christ’s gift. We go looking for each other to help each other trust and see that no matter what life has done to us, we are worthy because we are God’s beloved; we are holy because God never ceases to call us to wholeness; and we are growing into the fullness of life whose measure is Christ alone. God wants Christ to have a body on earth, both for our sake – so we become who we truly are as God’s own – and for the sake of the world – so the glory of God will shine forth from every nook and cranny of creation.

Now somebody will probably tell me this afternoon that this was the perfect moment to wrap things up, but I want to highlight just one more thing in this rich passage. At the beginning Paul writes, “I urge you then – I, the prisoner in the Lord – to lead a life worthy of the calling to which you have been called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love.” It’s a letter from prison, like Paul’s letter to the Philippians or Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail. However, Paul doesn’t simply refer to himself as a prisoner, but as a “prisoner in the Lord.” We can read that to mean he’s in prison because of his faith in Christ and his proclamation of Christ as Lord. But earlier in this letter as well as in two other letters, Paul refers to himself as a prisoner of the Lord.[3] Now we can still read that to mean he’s in prison for the sake of the Lord, but to me it’s a curious phrase, a prisoner of the Lord.

The root meaning of the word prisoner is bound or in bonds, and that opens up a surprising connection. In verse 3, Paul urges us to “make every effort to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace,” and the word for bond here has the same root as the word translated prisoner. Paul certainly was a prisoner when he wrote from prison, but he also wrote as one bound by Christ or one in the bonds of Christ and therefore one whose identity and life were inseparably bound to Christ, whether in or out of prison. Likewise, what is holding us together in unity is not some chain or rope tightly wrapped around us. We are being held together by the love of Christ who has bound himself to us, so that our death would be his and his life, ours. What is holding us all together is the bond of Christ’s peace, and so we too are “bound ones” in Christ for the sake of God’s mission to liberate all who are still bound by powers other than love.

Now to him who by the power at work within us and among us is able to accomplish abundantly far more than all we can ask or imagine, to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus to all generations, forever and ever. Amen.

 


[1] Thank you, Pete Cashmore http://mashable.com/2009/09/07/nerd-venn-diagram/

[2] Mt 4:21; Mk 1:19

[3] Eph 3:1; 2 Tim 1:8; Phm 1:1, 9

To the other side

“Let us go across to the other side,” Jesus had said to the disciples that evening when they took him with them in the boat. There was a great windstorm that night, and waves were beating into the boat, and the disciples were terrified, fearing the boat would go down and all of them with it, but Jesus commanded the sea to be still and the wind to cease. They crossed over to the other side to the country of the Gerasenes, and it was a stormy crossing. When they reached the other shore, immediately a man out of the tombs met Jesus, a man possessed by a legion of demons, and Jesus commanded the demons to leave the man, and they entered a herd of pigs, and the herd, numbering about two thousand, rushed down the steep bank into the sea and drowned. The storm at sea had only been the prelude to the storm unleashed on land, a storm of liberation among people who had not known the power of God who redeems the oppressed.

Crossing over to the other side appears to be Jesus’ preferred direction: From heaven to earth, from Jewish communities to the world of the Gentiles, from the streets where the poor struggle to survive to the homes of the wealthy, from rural Galilee to the city of Jerusalem, from rules written in stone to justice written in mercy, from death to life.

Crossing over to the other side appears to be Jesus’ preferred direction, but his crossings are never random zig-zag trips to wherever. They are purposeful invasions. They bring the very life and power of God into situations where life has been kept from flourishing.

I’m lingering with this theme of crossing over because on Friday the Supreme Court of the United States decided in Obergefell v. Hodges, a case marking a major cultural and legal shift in how we think and talk about marriage. For many of us, the decision affirmed what we believe equality before the law demands for same-sex couples. For some of us, the decision also affirmed what we believe to be the meaning of marriage as a Christian covenant of love and fidelity between two adults. For others among us, however, the court’s decision marks the end of Christian teaching informing the secular definition of marriage. The Supreme Court has ruled, but in the church things are far from settled. And so we must continue to be patient with each other, because some of us think the boat is being swamped by terrifying waves and there’s no way we’re not going down, while a good number of us are convinced we have finally reached the other shore where equality and a fuller meaning of marriage are at home.

Nancy and I had our twentieth wedding anniversary on Thursday. We were married in this sanctuary on Sunday, June 25, 1995, during morning worship. We celebrated our anniversary with a short trip, and before you get too carried away with ideas of a romantic get-away to the mountains or the lake, let me bring you back to earth. We went to visit Tennessee Tech and the University of Tennessee with our son; Miles will be a Senior after the summer, and we want him to see a few schools before he decides which college to attend. It was a curious choice to celebrate our anniversary with a college tour, but it was only partly driven by our schedules; our children and their well-being have been and will continue to be a significant dimension of our marriage, and so a college visit didn’t seem foreign at all. We toured UT on Friday morning, and I caught a headline about the Supreme Court decision on my phone, but I didn’t have time to read more; we were exploring dorm rooms, rec centers, and libraries. Yesterday I had time to read through the ruling, and I was moved by the language of the final paragraph concluding the argument for marriage equality:

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family.  In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were.  As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death.  It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage.  Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves.  Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions.  They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law.  The Constitution grants them that right.[1]

I believe this is a good decision, and not only for constitutional reasons. This decision lifts up and affirms the profoundly biblical character of marriage as a covenant rooted in God’s covenants of love and fidelity. The conversation isn’t over, though, it never is, and so we must continue to be patient with each other as we talk about the meaning of Christian marriage in an age when commitments of all kinds are under pressure by self-centered visions of life. I have lingered with the theme of crossing over to help us remember that we are in the boat with Jesus, and that the journey to the other side is a journey of promise, because Jesus brings the very life and power of God to us.

Our gospel passage for this day begins, “When Jesus had crossed again in the boat to the other side, a great crowd gathered around him.” Jesus doesn’t cross over randomly, but to bring life, new life to all who are oppressed by the power of death. Jesus comes and people gather. One of the many in the crowd is a synagogue president named Jairus, a man with a name, a man with a reputation and a position to uphold. But he is clearly a man at the end of his rope, a desperate man. He falls at Jesus’ feet, his hands and knees in the dust, and he begs him, repeatedly, “My little daughter is at the point of death. Come and lay your hands on her, so that she may be made well, and live.” His love for his daughter has made a beggar of Jairus. He doesn’t have the power to make her well, but he has heard enough about Jesus to be drawn to him. Driven solely by his love for his child and leaving behind any thought of position or propriety, Jairus falls to his knees and begs Jesus to come and lay his hands on his daughter. And Jesus comes with him. The child is at death’s door, but Jairus trusts that the touch of Jesus’ hands is the touch of life. How far is it from the shore to the house? How big is the crowd they have to push through to get to the girl’s bed? How long will it take? How much time do they have? Can’t you see him, pushing against bodies, gently at first, with his hands, then with his shoulders, pleading, shouting, “Let him through! Please, step aside! My little girl is dying.” And then, surrounded by people on every side, Jesus turns around and says, “Who touched my clothes?”

We’re the only ones who know about the woman in the crowd, the woman who has been bleeding for twelve years, the woman who has spent all she had on medical bills, the woman who hasn’t touched anyone in twelve years because of her condition and no one has touched her, the woman whose life has been dripping away slowly, the woman who heard about Jesus and came up behind him, saying to herself, over and over again, “If I but touch his clothes, I will be made well,” only we know about the woman in the crowd who reached out and touched his cloak.And immediately she felt that she was healed, but we’re the only ones who know about her.

Jesus is aware that power has gone out of him, and when he turns around and asks, “Who touched me?” she comes forward in fear and trembling and tells him the whole truth of her suffering and her poverty, the whole truth of her loneliness and her shame, and her hopelessness that ended when she heard of him and how all she could think of was, “If I but touch his clothes, I will be made well.”

That was all the faith she had, and now Jesus says to her, “Daughter, your faith has healed you; go in peace, free from your affliction.” He calls her daughter, which is such an important part of the whole truth, because she is not just some anonymous impoverished woman in the crowd, but a member of God’s family, a child of God. He calls her daughter, and that reminds us of Jairus and his little girl, and suddenly we remember the urgency with which he begged and pleaded. What about her?

The people who have come from the house say it’s too late now. “Your daughter has died; why trouble the teacher any more?” But Jesus says, “Do not be afraid, only have faith.” Hold on to the faith that brought you here. He goes to the house where the funeral is already underway, and he takes her mom and dad into her room with him, and he takes her by the hand and says, “Little girl, get up!” And she gets up.

That’s almost too much to take in, isn’t it? We know too many stories with a different ending. I’m praying for a family and their little girl who almost drowned in the pool on Wednesday; she is in a coma and I ask Jesus to go into her room with her mom and dad and take her by the hand and say, “Little girl, get up!”

But it’s not about knowing the magic words that will produce the outcome I want. As much as I or Jairus or any mom and dad might want that power to make our kids well or to change the world in an instant to make it a home for them and their children; to make it a world where each one’s uniqueness is honored and cherished, a world where the dignity of every child of God is sacred. It’s not about knowing the magic words, it’s about trusting God; it’s about holding on to the faith that draws us to Jesus. It’s about letting ourselves trust in him.

Crossing over to the other side appears to be Jesus’ preferred direction: from heaven to earth, from Jewish communities to the world of the Gentiles, from the streets where the poor struggle to survive to the homes of the wealthy, from rural Galilee to the city of Jerusalem, from rules written in stone to justice written in mercy, from death to life. Crossing over to the other side appears to be Jesus’ preferred direction and he takes us with him to where life in fullness awaits us all.

 


[1] Opinion of the Court, p. 28 http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf

Mother Emanuel

This is a time for lament. Please stand and, with a reading of their names, let us honor the lives of our brothers and sisters who were murdered on Wednesday:

Rev. Clementa Carlos Pinckney, 41, was the pastor of Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church and a member of the South Carolina Senate.

Cynthia Hurd, 54, served as the manager of the St. Andrews branch of the county library, a job she loved because it brought her closer to people.

DePayne Middleton Doctor, 49, was the mother of four daughters – the youngest is in junior high school and the oldest is in college.

Sharonda Coleman-Singleton, 45, was a coach for the girls’ track and field team and a speech therapist at Goose Creek High School. She was also on the church staff.

Tywanza Sanders, 26, had graduated from Allen University last year.

Ethel Lee Lance, 70, was a sexton at the church and had worked there for more than three decades.

Ethel’s cousin, Susie Jackson, was a longtime church member and died along with her; she was 87 years old.

Rev. Daniel L. Simmons Sr. was a retired pastor who attended Emanuel A.M.E. every Sunday for services and Wednesdays for Bible study.

Myra Thompson, 59, was teaching Bible study when she was killed.

This is a time for lament. This is not a time for rushing on to whatever is next in this age of constant distraction but for sitting still for a while. This is a time for mourning. This is a time for helping each other bear the burden of anger and rage, of helplessness and hopelessness and speechlessness. This is a time for lament.

How long, Lord, must I call for help,

but you do not listen?

Or cry out to you, “Violence!”

but you do not save?

Why do you make me look at injustice?

Why do you tolerate wrongdoing?

Destruction and violence are before me;

there is strife, and conflict abounds.

Therefore the law is paralyzed,

and justice never prevails.

The wicked hem in the righteous,

so that justice is perverted.[1]

Three themes have kept playing in my heart and mind these past few days.

One – In April, a young man in South Carolina got a .45 from his dad for his twenty-first birthday, and today, on Father’s Day, we are still struggling with what to call the man who shot and killed nine black men and women: a racist mass murderer or a troubled young man or a white supremacist terrorist?

Two – For some of us, Charleston, along with Ferguson and Baltimore, Birmingham and Little Rock and Memphis, now has become short-hand for the deadly consequences of the deeply entrenched racism in this country, a wound that just won’t heal, but for others the violent events those city names represent are only slightly troubling and soon forgotten episodes in a drama that can’t keep our attention because other things are more important.

Three – The flag of the United States and the South Carolina state flag are flying at half-mast at South Carolina government facilities while that cursed war flag is still there and still flying high on the grounds of the State Capitol in Columbia – for some of us the thought alone is unbearable, for others it’s no surprise or no big deal or a matter of pride. The mess we’re in is deep. The violent mess we have inherited and to whose continuance we contribute, knowingly or unknowingly, intentionally or unintentionally – the mess we’re in is deep. Please turn to the insert in your bulletin where you will find the words of Psalm 130, and let’s say the psalm together responsively.

Out of the depths I cry to you, O Lord,

Lord, hear my voice!

O let your ears be attentive

to the voice of my pleading.

If you, O Lord, should mark our guilt,

Lord, who could stand?

But with you is found forgiveness:

for this we revere you.

My soul is waiting for you, Lord.

In your word is my hope.

My soul is waiting for the Lord

more than watchmen for daybreak;

more than watchmen for daybreak.

O Israel, wait for the Lord,

for with the Lord there is mercy

and fullness of redemption.

The Lord will redeem Israel

from all its iniquity.

We are in the depths and we cry to God and we wait for daybreak. This was not the first time a place of worship and those who gather in it became the target of terrorist violence. African-American churches in particular have been burned and bombed by white men across the South ever since such churches existed, and racially motivated murder is hardly a new thing. We truly are in the depths.

More than fifty years ago, on September 15, 1963, a bomb exploded under the entrance to the 16th Street Baptist Church, in Birmingham, Alabama; four girls were killed in the blast, Addie Mae Collins (age 14), Carol Denise McNair (age 11), Carole Robertson (age 14), and Cynthia Wesley (age 14). They had a stained glass window in the sanctuary at 16th Street, a pretty window with Jesus in it, and in the explosion the window was barely damaged, except for the face of Jesus, which was blown out. I wish they had kept the window as it was and not restored it as a reminder that we are made in the image of God and that whatever we do to each other, we do to Jesus. That bombing was over fifty years ago, and there’s a memorial for the four girls at the church, and there’s a civil rights museum across the street, and yes, so much has changed since then, but, Lord help us, so much has not changed at all. Survivors of the shooting at Emanuel A.M.E. church tell us that the shooter said, “I have to do it. You rape our women and you’re taking over our country. And you have to go.”

On September 16, 1963, the day following the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church, a young white lawyer named Charles Morgan, Jr. spoke at a meeting of Birmingham businessmen. “Who did it?” he asked, “We all did it! The ‘who’ is every little individual who talks about the ‘niggers’ and spreads the seeds of his hate to his neighbor and his son ... And who is really guilty? Each of us. Each citizen who has not consciously attempted to bring about peaceful compliance with the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States, every citizen who has ever said ‘they ought to kill that nigger,’ every citizen who votes for the candidate with the bloody flag, every citizen and every school board member and schoolteacher and principal and businessman and judge and lawyer [and parent and grandparent] who has corrupted the minds of our youth; every person in this community who has in any way contributed during the past several years to the popularity of hatred, is at least as guilty, or more so, than the demented fool who threw that bomb.”[2]

Who did it? After the murders in Charleston it took the police only 14 hours before they arrested the suspect, and South Carolina is a death penalty state, so we know what to expect. But what about us? What about our role in perpetuating systems that privilege white folk and marginalize black and brown folk? What about the myth that killing the perpetrator will bring about justice, when all it does is perpetuate the deadly illusion that ridding the world of bad guys will somehow make it better, the very logic of exclusion and elimination that motivated the murderer? What about a culture of violence where a .45 is just the right birthday present for a young man? What about Sandy Hook? What about our amnesia?

More than fifty years ago, on September 18, 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. gave a eulogy at the funeral for three of the four girls killed in the bombing. He said, “These children—unoffending, innocent, and beautiful—were the victims of one of the most vicious and tragic crimes ever perpetrated against humanity. (…) They have something to say to each of us in their death. They have something to say to every minister of the gospel who has remained silent behind the safe security of stained-glass windows. They have something to say to every politician who has fed his constituents with the stale bread of hatred and the spoiled meat of racism. (…) They say to each of us, black and white alike, that we must substitute courage for caution. They say to us that we must be concerned not merely about who murdered them, but about the system, the way of life, the philosophy which produced the murderers.”[3]

The epistle reading for this Sunday contains Paul’s urgent plea for the Corinthians and for all to be reconciled to God. Reconciliation is about the restoration of broken relationships, the end of hostility and enmity, and the overcoming of alienation. Reconciliation in Christian terms is about God’s initiative through Jesus to restore us to our full humanity through forgiveness and healing mercy. And reconciliation in Christian terms is about our courageous participation in the divine mission of redemption as members in the body of Christ.

“Our heart is wide open to you,” wrote Paul to the Corinthians in response to some painful difficulties they were having, and then urged them, “open wide your hearts also.”[4] This vulnerability of love, this frankness of speech that is unafraid of honesty in hearing and in speaking, this courage to risk embracing the other for the sake of wholeness and fullness of life is the heart of reconciliation.

I invite you to turn again to the insert in the bulletin, and to look at the picture of Jesus. It’s a stained-glass window given by the people of Wales to 16th Street Baptist Church in 1964. Here we see the vulnerability of God’s love that welcomes sinners. We see the arms that embrace us all for the sake of wholeness and fullness of life. We see the face of God.

Mother Emanuel, its pastors and its people, its prayer and its hospitality, its witness in word and deed and even in death, faithfully embodied this vision of life that has room for all, to the glory of God. The nine who were murdered have something to say to each of us in their death: “Our heart is wide open to you; open wide your hearts also.”

 


[1] Habakkuk 1:1-4

[2] See http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/09/the-speech-that-shocked-birmingham-the-day-after-the-church-bombing/279565/ Additions in brackets are mine.

[3] See http://kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/documentsentry/doc_eulogy_for_the_martyred_children/

[4] 2 Cor 6:11,13

Impressions from Israel

 

My recent trip to Israel with a group of leaders from Nashville's Jewish community and fellow pastors from area churches left a deep impact on me. On Wednesday, June 24, at 6:30 p.m., in Fellowship Hall at Vine Street Christian Church, I will show some pictures and talk about this deeply transformative experience. I know this presentation could last hours, but it is scheduled to be over no later than 8 p.m. We will serve lemonade and cookies, and infant/toddler care as well as programming for young school-age children will be provided. If you are interested and free that night, please come over and join us.

Stories to live with

On our first day in Israel, after landing at Ben Gurion airport in Tel Aviv, we got on the bus to Jerusalem, and after only a few miles we stopped. We got off the bus and looked around; we were in the middle of nowhere. The land was rocky, dry, and hot. We were each given a small hoe and a twig—a twig no more than eight or nine inches long, with maybe seven tiny leaves on one end and a few roots on the other, and we went and dug holes in the rocky, dry, hot dirt, and we each planted one tree. They were oaks, we were told, but they didn’t look mighty at all; tender little things they were, softly asking us to take care of them, but we splashed some water on them, said a prayer, got back on the bus, and drove on. Out of the sixteen we planted, perhaps only one or two will grow and flourish, but that will be enough to continue to heal and restore the land.

The moment reminded me of a story I have long loved. It’s of a hiker in the mountains in the south of France who one day, while looking for water, met a shepherd who invited him to spend the night.

I gratefully accepted. We gathered his sheep and walked to his cabin in a steep valley. After dinner, the Shepherd left the room and returned with a small sack. He dumped the contents – about two hundred acorns – out on the table. He scrutinized each one carefully and sorted them into piles. He discarded all with cracks. Through this process he eventually ended up with ten piles of ten acorns each. He placed this carefully selected piles of acorns into a bucket of water, then showed me to a corner where I unrolled by blanket and made my bed for the night.

The next day, he invited me to join him as he walked to the top of a nearby ridge. He carried an iron staff the thickness of my thumb and about shoulder height in length. As we reached the top of the ridge, the Shepherd began poking his staff into the ground, making small holes about two inches deep. Into each he placed one of his carefully selected acorns. He was planting trees. I asked if this was his land. It was not – he did not know who owned it. Perhaps it was common land, or owned by the parish. It did not matter to him. With the same care with which he seemed to do everything, he planted one hundred acorns.

At midday, he returned to his home for lunch. Afterward, he again sorted out one hundred acorns. When I told him that in thirty years his ten thousand oaks would be a magnificent forest, he responded by saying that if God granted him health, in thirty years these ten thousand oaks would be but a drop in the ocean.

The story is based on the life of Elzéard Bouffier who, after the death of his wife and son, moved to the mountains, and over a period of fifty years planted hundreds of thousands of trees.

He began planting trees, he said, because the land was dying for want of trees, and he had nothing more important to do.[1]

Jesus teaches that the kingdom of God is as if someone would scatter seed on the ground, and would sleep and rise night and day, and the seed would sprout and grow, how, he does not know. Jesus doesn’t give us a timetable for the coming of the kingdom of God, nor does he provide a blueprint or a constitution for that wondrous realm of peace. Instead of answers to our questions of when and how and where, he gives us stories with shepherds and gardeners, trees and birds in them – parables that explain very little. Who is this gardener who scatters seed on the ground, and then nothing is mentioned about watering or weeding or keeping the rabbits away? Are we to think of God as the gardener or Jesus, or perhaps anyone who plants seeds trusting that they will grow? Are we to think of ourselves as gardeners or as the soil in which the seed of Jesus’ life and teachings take root and flourish into a harvest of life, and we don’t know how? Or are we to think of ourselves as perhaps both the soil and the gardener, in turn receiving and spreading the powerful little seeds of God’s reign?

“We have so little to do with Christ’s nearness to us,” says Wendy Farley, “that we can just go to sleep. In fact, it might be better if we did sleep through the whole thing, snug and safe, resting like babies in our mothers’ arms.” No doubt, the man who planted trees rested like a baby every night. No need to go back day after day, anxious to see how the acorns were doing. He simply got up every morning and went out to poke holes in the soil and plant seeds, because he had nothing more important to do.

Martin Luther clearly saw himself as a sower when he wrote, “I simply taught, preached, and wrote God’s Word; otherwise I did nothing. And while I slept or drank Wittenberg beer with my friends Philip and Amsdorf, the Word so greatly weakened the papacy that no prince or emperor ever inflicted such losses on it. I did nothing; the Word did everything.” You can enter the parable imagining yourself to be the gardener, or the seed, or the soil, and each entrance takes you into a different story that is still the same parable. Once the seed is in the ground, the miracle happens, we don’t know how. Parables resist complete explanation; they aren’t locked treasure boxes that reveal their splendor only to those who find the proper key. No, they are living stories that mess with our presumptions, surprise and confound us, revealing ever new facets of meaning to those who live with them as companions on the way to the kingdom. Parables just won’t sit still long enough so we can turn them into simple one-liners we can add to our list of the facts of life. Parables don’t offer answers that settle things, but rather point us back, again and again, to the one who speaks the word to us with many such stories that keep us wondering and who is himself for us the parable of God.

“With what can we compare the kingdom of God,” Jesus asks, “or what parable will we use for it?” And he wanders the whole realm of nature, teeming with mighty creatures like the lion and the eagle, the bull and the bear, creatures gladly chosen by human empires as symbols of power, but conspicuously absent from Jesus’ stories of God’s reign. If not one of those emblems of strength, how about the mighty trees that since the days of the prophets represented the great empires?

Consider Assyria, a cedar of Lebanon, says Ezekiel: beautiful branches, forest shade, towering height; indeed, its top went up between the clouds. Waters nourished it, the deep raised it up, making its rivers flow around the place it was planted, sending forth its streams to all the trees of the field. So it towered high above all the trees of the field; its boughs grew large and its branches long, from abundant water in its shoots. All the birds of the air made their nests in its boughs; all the animals of the field gave birth to their young under its branches; and in its shade all great nations lived. It was beautiful in its greatness and in its lush foliage; for its roots went down to abundant water.[2]

Ezekiel dreamed of God planting a tender shoot on Israel’s mounainous highlands, and how it would send out branches and bear fruit. How it would grow into a mighty cedar, and birds of every kind would nest in it and find shelter in the shade of its boughs.[3]

“With what can we compare the kingdom of God,” asks Jesus, “or what parable will we use for it?” How about the mighty cedar, the majestic oak, or the elegant and generous date palm? There are so many to choose from, but Jesus returns from his nature walk holding up – a mustard seed.

Many of us barely remembered that mustard is a plant; we know it primarily as the stuff in yellow bottles we squeeze on our hot dogs. Some of us may note how every time we clean out the fridge we find another handful of the little plastic packets, left over from some burger we brought home who knows when, and we wonder how long they have been hiding behind the ketchup. The mustard seed may be small, but the packets are invisible to the human eye until they want to be found – how about that for a parable? But no, there’s nothing mighty or majestic about mustard. It has medicinal uses and adds flavor to many dishes, but few gardeners would sow it on purpose. It grows all too readily on its own, and once it appears, it takes over first the bed, then the garden and the farm, and then the neighbors’ fields. You can call it a plant, but you could just as well call it a weed: fast-growing, drought-resistant, and impossible to control, it tends to take over where it is not wanted.

“With what can we compare the kingdom of God or what parable will we use for it?” asks Jesus, and in response he talks about an invasive weed. Mustard grows dependably wherever there’s just enough soil for the tiniest of seeds to take root. It grows just about anywhere, not just on the mountain heights of Lebanon or the hills of Rome or by the great rivers of Egypt or Babylon. Another notable detail about the mustard shrub is the fact that it is an annual plant. It doesn’t just sit there and simply get bigger and bigger with the years; it depends on renewed sowing.

I hear in this parable a divine affirmation of seemingly small actions by ordinary people. I hear a divine affirmation of the small things we do in the name of Jesus that may seem utterly insignificant in the grand scheme of history, but are indeed seeds of God’s reign that grow – we don’t know how – until the harvest comes. Every small act of love and compassion matters. Every unsung moment of forgiveness, every little word or gesture of encouragement matters. No matter how rocky, dry, and hot the land. We have nothing more important to do.

 


[1] The story is fictional, but that doesn’t mean it’s not true, does it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Who_Planted_Trees

[2] Ezekiel 31:2-7

[3] Ezekiel 17:22-24