The first line of the New Testament reads, An account of the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham. The gospel according to Matthew opens with a long list of names, beginning with the age of the patriarchs, then tracing the line of David through the age of kings to the deportation to Babylon, and from the exile to the Messiah. Imagine you’re the reader at the lectern. The opening verses of Matthew, that’s your worst-night-mare scenario: line after line of near-unpronounceable names from A like Aminadab to Z like Zerubbabel.
When you quietly read the Bible by yourself, those are the parts you usually skip, why would anybody think that stuff like that ought to be read in worship? Well, the lectionary which recommends readings for each worship service of the year, skips those parts, too, and goes straight to Jesus, Mary and Joseph in verse 18. Yet our ancestors in the faith found significance in that long list of names; we miss that by skipping them.
We miss the names of four women sprinkled among the names of all those fathers: Tamar, the widow of one of Judah’s sons, who was found to be pregnant long after her husband’s death; and Judah harshly denounced her until he realized that he himself was the father.[1] Rahab, a Canaanite prostitute from Jericho who was praised as righteous.[2] Bathsheba, the wife of Uriah, who became pregnant by David and told him.[3] And Ruth, the Moabite, who slipped under Boaz’s blanket to convince him to marry her. These four women practiced a kind of righteousness that might appear scandalous, and they prepare us for a seeming scandal in the fifth woman named in the Messiah’s lineage, Mary. They also prepare us for Joseph who is called to practice a kind of righteousness that might appear scandalous, but serves the saving purposes of God.
What we miss by not reading the genealogy is that of the fourteen kings that Matthew lists only two could be considered as faithful to God’s covenant laws. “The rest were an odd assortment of idolaters, murderers, incompetents, power-seekers, and harem-wastrels,” as Raymond E. Brown put it.[4] We also miss that most of Jesus’ ancestors after the Babylonian exile were unknown people whose names were never entered in the records of “sacred history for having done something significant.” What we miss is the marvelous unpredictability of God who clearly is not in the habit of choosing the best or the noble or the saintly, and who accomplishes the divine purposes through people whom “others regard as unimportant and forgettable.”[5]
Unimportant and forgettable describes Joseph quite well. In our Christmas pageants, he rarely ever gets a speaking part, and if he does, it’s little more than a brief exchange with a grumpy innkeeper. On paintings of the nativity, he is usually depicted as an older man in the background who is trying to make himself useful by holding a lantern or putting a blanket on Mary’s shoulders. Of the four gospels, Matthew is the only one that draws our attention to him at all. Luke barely mentions him. And even in Matthew, he appears in chapter one, disappears by chapter two, and never utters a direct sentence. Unimportant. Forgettable.
Joseph was engaged to Mary and in his day that meant they had already signed the marriage license. Even though they weren’t yet living under one roof together, everyone knew them to be husband and wife. In those days, if some problem arose during this transition period, you couldn’t just cancel the cake and the caterer, you had to file for divorce. And for Joseph, a problem had arisen indeed, and with every passing week, the problem got a little bigger. An old English carol tells us,
Joseph and Mary walked through an orchard green,
Where was berries and cherries, as thick as might be seen.
O then bespoke Mary, so meek and so mild:
‘Pluck me one cherry, Joseph, for I am with child.’
O then bespoke Joseph, with words most unkind:
‘Let him pluck thee a cherry that got thee with child.’[6]
That’s not what Matthew tells us. The carol ends with Jesus, from the womb, commanding the tallest tree to bend down before Mary so that she can pick as many cherries as she pleases. The boy and his mother take center stage, and Joseph, once again, is pushed to the edge of the scene. Matthew is more than careful to note that Joseph was anything but unkind. Joseph, being a righteous man and unwilling to expose her to public disgrace, planned to dismiss her quietly. Of all the options he had, Joseph chose the kindest one. He could have chosen to shame Mary by publicly demanding a divorce. He could have chosen to have her stoned to death for adultery—he could have, it was perfectly lawful, and some of his neighbors, had they known about the situation, probably would have expected him to uphold the demands of a man’s honor and of God’s law, which in this and many other cases were identical.
Joseph was a righteous man, a man who sought to live according to the commandments of God, but apparently he didn’t “just do what the book says.”[7] He was living a different kind of righteousness. The only way to honor God’s law and Mary was to divorce her discreetly so as not to humiliate her and her family or endanger her and the child. And just when he had resolved to do this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream. “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife, for the child conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you are to name him Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” What appeared to be a moral outrage and cause for righteous indignation, turned out to be, according to the words of the dream angel, a divine initiative. The child in Mary’s womb, the angel said, was not a violation of God’s holy will, but an expression of it, a gift from the Holy Spirit, for the salvation of God’s people. [8]
It was a moment that called for great courage in obeying. Joseph was to keep his marriage to Mary and he was to name Mary’s child Jesus, thus adopting him as his son and making him a son of David. When Joseph awoke from sleep, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him; he took her as his wife … and he named him Jesus.
We can read the Bible as a book of rules, and seek to live a kind of righteousness that keeps everything in proper order. We can read the Bible and find justification for abusing, humiliating, disgracing, and hurting, and it’s all in proper order. But the story of Jesus starts out with proper order being completely rearranged, which is Matthew’s way of saying that with the coming of Jesus a new kind of righteousness is moving from the background to the center. A righteousness of radical grace. The story of Jesus begins like the story of creation, with the stirring of God’s Spirit. Through this baby, God is making all things new.
According to Fred Craddock, “Joseph is the first person in the New Testament who learned how to read the Bible.” He rose above conventional morality and read Scripture through a lens of radical grace, the lens of a God who authors salvation in unpredictable ways on the crooked lines of our lives. And with great courage Joseph embraced the new life God had initiated and asked him to adopt, quite literally. Joseph was the first person to face the tension of “You have heard that it was said … but I say to you,” the tension between the prevailing understanding of God’s commandments and the newness that entered the world through Jesus.[9] To Matthew, Joseph was the first disciple, already living out the new and better righteousness of the kingdom which Jesus came to proclaim.[10]
Back to the genealogy. Laura Mendenhall suggests, that “when the angel came to Joseph, perhaps God had two adoptions in mind.” The first one would have been Jesus’ adoption as a son of Joseph and therefore a son of David and a son of Abraham. And through the second one “Joseph and his whole family were made part of Jesus’ family.” All the way back to Abraham, the whole family was included into the story of Jesus who came to save his people from their sins. “That whole family tree, the good, the bad, and the ugly, were all adopted when Joseph named the child Jesus.”[11]
The God who wrote the beginnings of our redemption with crooked lines also writes the rest of the story with crooked lines, and some of those lines are our own lives and witness. God continues to use the unknown and the unsung for God’s saving purposes. No one is unimportant. No one is too insignificant to contribute to the story of Jesus Christ in the world. Joseph remains on the edge of the scene, but not his kindness, not his courage. May they illuminate our hearts as we await the final coming of Christ.
[1] Genesis 38
[2] Joshua 2 and James 2:25
[3] 2 Samuel 11
[4] Raymond E. Brown, A Coming Christ in Advent: Essays on the Gospel Narratives Preparing for the Birth of Jesus: Matthew 1 and Luke 1 (Collegeville, Minnesota: LTP, 1988)
[5] Ibid.
[6] The Cherry Tree Carol http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/eng/child/ch054.htm
[7] Fred Craddock, “God is with us,” The Cherry Log Sermons (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001) 5.
[8] See Thomas G. Long, Matthew. Westminster Bible Companion, (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1997), 13.
[9] See Mt 5:21-48
[10] Mt 5:20
[11] Laura S. Mendenhall, “Adoption” Journal for Preachers Vol. 25, No. 1 (Advent 2001), 41.